Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Great Lakes Res. 2018 Aug;44(4):716–724. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.03.007

Table 1.

Overall Kendall’s tau coefficients and Kendall-Theil trends before and after age normalization for legacy contaminants in GL lake trout (excluding walleye samples in Lake Erie) from 2005 to 2014. A number in bold means the results are statistically significant.

Legacy contaminants Kendall’s tau coefficient before normalizationa Kendall-Theil trend before normalization (percentage/year)b Kendall’s tau coefficient after normalizationa Kendall-Theil trend after normalization (percentage/year)b
PCBs −0.39 −7.9 (−6.4, −9.4) −0.40 −10.2 (−8.5, −12.1)
DDTs −0.39 −8.1 (−6.7, −9.6) −0.48 −13.2 (−113, −15.1)
Dieldrin −0.36 −7.6 (−6.1, −9.1) −0.47 −11.7 (−9.9, −13.6)
Endrin −0.36 −9.2 (−7.4, −11) −0.46 −10.5 (−8.6, −12.4)
Chlordane −0.41 −7.7 (−63, −9.1) −0.48 −11.4 (−9.8, −13.2)
Oxychlordane −0.31 −6.6 (−5, −8.2) −0.53 −12 (−10.5, −13.5)
Nonachlor 0.01 0.1 (1.2, −0.9) −0.52 −11.5 (−9.9, −13.2)
HCB −0.22 −2 (−1.4, −2.7) −0.21 −3.7 (−2.4, −4.9)
a

Kendall’s tau coefficient (from −1 to 1) indicating the slope of the trend.

b

Two numbers in parentheses indicate lower 95% and upper 95% slopes.