Table 3. Summary of QTL analysis with significant QTLs identified in different years as well as the average over three years.

QTL location (cM)	Linkage group	Marker interval	Position interval (cM)	LOD	Pvalue (F)	Percent variation explained	Contributing parent
2011
14@77.9	14	Os87_c10557_a -Oc_1666_a	71.1–84.8	3.6	0.025	30.8	TDa95/00328
2012
1@45.1	1	Oc_917_a-Oc_913a	8.1–75.4	3.1	0.037	12.23	TDa95/00328 and TDa95-310
4@92.8	4	Oc_232_a-Oc_2231_a	83.1–110.6	2.9	0.035	9.23	TDa95/00328 and TDa95-310
14@77.9	14	Os87_c10557 a Oc_1666_a	71.1–84.8	4.1	0.0003	75.6	TDa95/00328
2013
9@45.9	9	Os87_lrc4485_a Wc_531_a	6.2–51.2	2.7	0.2	5.2	TDa95/00328 and TDa95-310
12@92.5	12	Wc_1831_b—Oc_4843_a	12.4–208.2	3.8	0.002	39.6	TDa95/00328
14@77.9	14	Os87_c10557 a Oc_1666_a	71.1–84.8	3.7	0.0003	33.4	TDa95/00328
16@100.6	16	NHsB9_c11075_2_a—Oc_2065_a	0–195.0	2.5	0.009	5.21	TDa95/00328 and TDa95-310
Average across 3 years
12@167.5	12	Wc_1831_b—Oc_4843_a	12.4–208.2	2.9	0.003	4.9	TDa95/00328 and TDa95-310
14@77.9	14	Os87_c10557 a Oc_1666_a	71.1–84.8	4.5	0.0004	68.9	TDa95/00328