Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204105

Table 2. Data on normalized PTT and PEP variability.


Normalized PTT in %
(PTT mean in ms)
SD PTT in % of PTT
(PTT SD in ms)
% of PEP with respect to PTT % of SD PEP with respect to PTT
1 100 (305) 1.6 (5) 22.4 1.1
2 100 (272) 2.6 (7) 25.8 1.1
3 100 (285) 2.5 (7) 28.3 0.9
4 100 (299) 1.7 (5) 18.5 1.3
5 100 (309) 1.9 (6) 16.1 1.3
6 100 (268) 1.1 (3) 21.8 1.3
7 100 (266) 1.9 (5) 20.7 1.5
8 100 (286) 1.0 (3) 17.9 0.8
9 100 (230) 1.7 (4) 23.8 1.3
10 100 (270) 1.9 (5) 25.9 1.5
11 100 (272) 1.1 (3) 14.9 1.2
12 100 (274) 0.7 (2) 18.3 1.2
13 100 (247) 4.5 (11) 29.9 1.7
14 100 (271) 3.3 (9) 19.6 0.7
15 100 (292) 1.0 (3) 22.5 1.2
16 100 (240) 5.8 (14) 17.5 1.3
17 100 (330) 2.7 (9) 24.2 1.7
18 100 (294) 2.0 (6) 12.7 1.5
19 100 (276) 5.4 (15) 16.7 2.1
20 100 (315) 3.8 (12) 22 1.2
Mean group 100 2.4 21.0 1.3

Values are normalized as percentage (%) of the PTT sensor of the index finger of the right hand group 1 (control group <50 years). The PTT mean ± SD (in ms) of 10 consecutive heartbeats are given for each person. For calculation of the normalized data see Formula 1. In group 1 the normalized PTT showed a significant difference between the left and right hand, respectively 100%±3.1% versus 100%±2.4% (p = 0.004).