Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2018 Aug 21;24(8):2042–2050.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.054

Figure 5. Comparison between Model and Experimental Results.

Figure 5.

Graph indicates the observed CC between preferred orientations of single neurons at two spatial frequencies. The pairs of spatial frequencies being compared are indicated on the x axis. Green: Calcium imaging. Blue: Electrophysiology. Purple: Model with circular thalamic receptive fields (same as in Figure 4). Red: Model with elongated thalamic receptive fields (see Results and Figure S9). Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals on the CC. For calcium: CC for 0.01–0.04 cyc/deg = 0.08, for 0.02–0.04 cyc/ deg = 0.33, and for 0.03–0.04 cyc/deg = 0.53. Electrophysiological data: CC for 0.01–0.04 cyc/deg = 0.03, for 0.02–0.04 cyc/deg = 0.28, and for 0.03–0.04 cyc/deg = 0.67.