Table 2.
Effect of DBT intervention on recidivism controlling for potential confounders (different distribution between program group with P < 0.25 as indicated in Table 1)
| Model 1 All participants |
Model 2 Age < 50 years |
Model 3 Desire for Help Score > 35 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Adjusted Risk Ratio (95% confidence interval) | P | Adjusted Risk Ratio (95% confidence interval) | P | Adjusted Risk Ratio (95% confidence interval) | P | |
| Program | ||||||
| HP | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| DBT | 0.59 (0.26–1.35) | 0.208 | 0.46 (0.19–1.11) | 0.085 | 0.4 (0.16–1.00) | 0.050 |
| Site | ||||||
| DWC + Amistad | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Prototypes | 2.22 (0.73–6.72) | 0.158 | 3.26 (0.58–18.27) | 0.178 | 2.28 (0.71–7.36) | 0.168 |
| Employment in household | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | - |
| Yes | 0.50 (0.10–2.54) | 0.405 | 0.42 (0.08–2.23) | 0.308 | 0.78 (0.14–4.45) | 0.782 |
| Devaluation and discrimination score (+1) | 0.98 (0.95–1.01) | 0.259 | 0.99 (0.95–1.02) | 0.445 | 0.97 (0.94–1.00) | 0.064 |
| Months since last incarceration (+1) | 0.57 (0.13–2.46) | 0.451 | 0.51 (0.11–2.38) | 0.391 | 0.84 (0.22–3.24) | 0.797 |