Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jun 26;20(10):1379–1381. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1231

Table 1.

Complexities with Current HF Nomenclature

Current HF Terminology Challenges with Use
Ejection Fraction • Fails to reflect underlying biology or pathophysiology
• Specific thresholds are arbitrarily selected
• Depends on loading conditions and arrhythmia status
• The conventional and widely used 2D echocardiographic assessment subject to intra- and inter-observer variability and variability in the quality of image acquisition
NYHA Functional Class • Depends on congestive status
• Symptoms and functional status may be limited by comorbidities
• Subjective and variably graded by clinicians
• Dynamic and labile over the short-term
Stage B HF • Uncertain application to HF with preserved ejection fraction
• Use of more sensitive imaging modalities may expand this population
• Non-structural changes may represent clinically-relevant pre-clinical states (e.g., atrial arrhythmias)
Advanced / Stage D HF • Depends on treatment intensity (i.e., use of inotropes or mechanical circulatory support)
• Depends on response to therapies (i.e., lack of adequate response or intolerance to evidence-based therapies)
• May not correlate with cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Acute HF and Worsening HF • Generally defined as synonymous with a hospitalization for HF and subject to wide regional and practice-based variation in thresholds for hospitalization
• Similar level of care and acuity may be managed in the outpatient setting in some practices
• Decision to hospitalize a patient for HF dependent on many factors other than the severity of the HF presentation, including age, comorbidities, and non-clinical factors (e.g., patient preference, patient living/social situation, physician/hospital financial incentives)

Abbreviations: HF = heart failure

NYHA = New York Heart Association