Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;8:14. doi: 10.1186/s12348-018-0158-3

Table 4.

Prognostic factors associated with good visual outcomes

Prognostic factor (referent) Crude odds ratio (95% CI) p valuea Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p valueb
Gender (male)
 Female 2 (0.92, 4.37) 0.079
Age (0–50 years)
 > 50 years 0.85 (0.39, 1.86) 0.679
Medical illness (yes)
 No 1.60 (0.55, 4.63) 0.383
DM (yes)
 No 2.12 (0.93, 4.85) 0.071
Presenting VA (≥ CF)
 < CF 0.10 (0.04, 0.25) 0.000 0.09 (0.021, 0.384) 0.001
Fundus view (yes)
 No 0.15 (0.06, 0.38) 0.000 0.337 (0.068, 1.675) 0.184
Source of infection (yes)
 No 2.61 (0.93, 7.37) 0.062
Culture (positive)
 Negative 1.29 (0.54, 3.07) 0.566
Organism (gram+)
 Gram− 0.965 (0.275–3.386) 0.956
 Fungal 0.185 (0.019, 1.848) 0.151
Intravitreal antibiotic (yes)
 No 2.85 (0.62, 13.2) 0.234
Vitrectomy (yes)
 No 1.13 (0.53–2.41) 0.751
Early vitrectomy (≤ 2 weeks)
 > 2 weeks 1.69 (0.59–4.82) 0.327

The clinical summary of patients were summarized in Table 5

aUnivariate logistic regression

bOnly factors associated with good visual outcome in multivariate logistic regression model