Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 6;121(5):482–498. doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0143-5

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Microepistasis. The model names are abbreviated (Power Law—PL, Stickbreaking—SB, Saturation—ST, Thermodynamics—TH, FGM). a The correlation coefficient for microepistasis on the Budding yeast dataset was computed using the general parameters inferred from the adaptation data for each model except FGM. b The correlation coefficient for microepistasis on the LTEE dataset was computed using the general parameters inferred from the adaptation data for each model except FGM. c, d Simulations using the best set of parameters for microepistasis obtained for the power law model using the information from adaptation on the Budding yeast or LTEE data, respectively. Poits represent the experimental data and lines the model prediction