Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 12;10(11):327–333. doi: 10.1177/1756287218793084

Table 1.

Measured outcomes of Rezum at 12 months.

Authors Year N = total
n = Rezum
IPSS (%) reduction Qmax (%) improvement PVR (%) reduction IPSS QoL (%) reduction IIEF-EF (%) improvement Complications
(related adverse events), n
Supported by industry
Clavien–Dindo I-II Clavien–Dindo III–V
McVary and Roehrborn (RCT)10 2017 N = 201
n = 136
53 55 5 52 −1 Dysuria: 16.9%
Haematuria: 11.8%
Frequency and Urgency: 5.9%
N = 3 (2.2%)
(urinary retention =1, hospitalization due to nausea and vomiting =1, NOS = 1)
Yes
Dixon and colleagues (pilot)8 2016 N = 65
n = 65
58 55 32 61 11 Urinary retention: 33.8%
Dysuria: 21.5%
Urgency: 20%
UTI (suspected): 20%
Haematuria: 13.8%
Poor stream: 13.8%
Pain/discomfort: 10.8%
Nocturia: 7.7%
Frequency: 6.2%
Fever: 4.6%
Dribbling: 3.1%
Scrotal pain: 3.1%
Incontinence: 1.5%
N = 3 (4.6%)
(urinary retention = 1, poor stream = 1, urinary frequency = 1)
Yes
Roehrborn and colleagues (crossover)12 2017 N = 53
n = 53
56 53 17 55 18 Dysuria: 18.9%
Haematuria: 11.3%
N = 3 (5.6%)
(bladder neck contracture = 1, bladder stone formation =1, sepsis = 1)
Yes
Darson and colleagues11 2017 N = 131
n = 131
45 51 35 38 n/a Acute urinary retention: 10.7% Nil No

IIEF-EF, international index of erectile function; IPSS, international prostate symptom score; n/a, not applicable; NOS, not otherwise specified; PVR, post-void residual; Qmax, urine flow rate; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomized controlled trail; UTI, urinary tract infection.