Table 3.

Detailed descriptions of included qualitative studies, organized by primary PCC objective

Study author and title		Type of intervention	Intervention details	Outcomes (Person-centered care (PCC), labor and delivery, perinatal, mental health)
Person-centered Objective: Autonomy
1.	Brown, 2015	Autonomy	Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of women-held case records, thematic analysis of qualitative data Sample size: 21	PCC Outcomes: Improved communication with providers, especially shared communication.
2.	De Koninck	Autonomy	Intervention: Continuity midwifery model implemented into birth centers that employed 3–6 midwives to provide care to one woman through prenatal, birth, and postpartum. Where: Canada Population: Pregnant women Study design: Intervention and matched controls Sample size: 10	PCC Outcomes: Improved communication with continuity midwifery model. Women reported holding back questions during rushed doctor visits. Continuity midwifery clients reported feeling respected and more humanized.
3.	Horey, 2015	Autonomy	Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs involving decision support for women with a prior caesarean, narrative synthesis of qualitative data. Sample size: 84	PCC Outcomes: Perceived benefits to having choices and information, but only information in appropriate context of risk and benefits.
4.	Walsh, 1999	Autonomy	Intervention: Continuity midwifery Where: England Population: Multiparous women Study Design: Ethnographic interviews Sample size: 10	PCC Outcomes: Women valued having continuity because it was easier to feel comfortable and ask questions. Felt empowered in labor.
Person-centered Objective: Supportive Care
5.	Kildea, 2012	Supportive Care	Intervention: Specialist antenatal clinic for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Where: Australia Population: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women Study Design: A triangulation mixed-methods approach (including individual and focus group interviews; surveys) Sample size: 19	PCC Outcomes: Appreciated flexible drop-in schedule of the clinic.
6.	Stapleton, 2013	Supportive Care	Intervention: Specialty antenatal clinic for women from refugee backgrounds. Where: Australia Population: Women from refugee backgrounds Study Design: mixed-methods, data from hospital databases, a chart audit, surveys and interviews with service users, providers and stakeholders Sample size: 10	PCC Outcomes: Women appreciated the continuity model because it saved them time with translation; they didn’t have to repeat conversations.
Person-centered Objective: Social support
7.	Hazard, 2009	Social Support	Intervention: Hispanic Labor Friends assisted women with communication with healthcare providers and emotional/physical Where: United States Population: Hispanic immigrant women Study Design: Descriptive qualitative inquiry Sample size: 21	PCC Outcomes: Women appreciated having the linguistic and cultural connection with Hispanic doulas. Women reported better informed consent.
8.	Herrman, 2012	Social Support	Intervention: Group ANC Where: United States Population: Pregnant women Study Design: A thematic and iterative analysis Sample size: 33	PCC Outcomes: Felt respected. Felt more informed by drawing from other women’s experiences.
9.	Risisky, 2013	Social Support	Intervention: Group ANC Where: United States Population: Pregnant women Study Design: Thematic analysis Sample size: 10	PCC Outcomes: Women reported richer information sharing in the group environment