. 2018 Sep 13;4(5):437–447. doi: 10.1002/osp4.297

Table 4.

DXA measures of adiposity^a and anthropometry regressed on MRI VFM variables with and without age in the models (n = 32)

Dependent	Age covariate	Predictor(s)
		DXA VPF + WC	DXA APF + WC	DXA TBPF + WC	DXA VPF + BMI	DXA APF + BMI	DXA TBPF + BMI
		Adjusted R ²	Adjusted R ²	Adjusted R ²	Adjusted R ²	Adjusted R ²	Adjusted R ²
MRI VFM L4–L5	Without	0.71^e	0.72^d	0.71^d	0.71^d	0.71^d	0.69^d
MRI VFM L4–L5	With	0.71^e	0.72^e	0.72^e	0.70^d	0.70^d	0.69^d
MRI VFM sum^b	Without	0.68^c	0.74^d	0.72^c	0.69^c	0.74^c	0.72^c
MRI VFM sum^b	With	0.70^e	0.74^d	0.74^c	0.70^d	0.74^c	0.73^c

This table only shows the results of regressions performed with DXA per cent fat variables because they had the highest adjusted R ² and lowest SEE values when compared with DXA fat mass variables.

DXA measures of adiposity: DXA APF, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry android per cent fat; DXA TBPF, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry total body per cent fat; DXA VPF, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry visceral per cent fat. DXA android fat variables were measured using automatic ROI for android region.

MRI VFM sum = sum of four slices (L1–L2 + L2–L3 + L3–L4 + L4–L5).

DXA variable was significant (p ≤ 0.05) in regression model; however, anthropometric variable and/or age was not significant.

DXA and anthropometric variables were significant (p ≤ 0.05) in regression model.

Anthropometric variable was significant; however, DXA and/or age were not significant.

BMI, body mass index; DXA, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ROI, region of interest; VFM, visceral fat mass; WC, waist circumference.