Table 1.
Selected interventions targeting social determinants of mental health
Intervention | Objective | Characteristics of the intervention |
Participants | Outcome Variables | Main Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Family, Household and Working Life Interventions | |||||
Housing First [61] |
Combine Housing First with assertive community treatment to assist people with serious mental illness to exit homelessness |
Housing First= homeless assistance program, prioritizes providing permanent housing before getting a job or addressing mental health/ substance use symptoms |
Randomized control trial with 50 homeless participants with serious mental illness |
Housing stability Community functioning |
Housing First participants spent more time in stable housing, entered housing more quickly, rated the quality of their housing more positively, reported higher quality of life |
Housing First [64] |
Compare mental health service use among individuals who received Housing First vs. standard care |
See above | Multi-site randomized controlled trial with 2039 severely mental ill and homeless participants |
Reported service use over 24 months |
Housing first program decreased use of inpatient psychiatric hospitals and increased use of food banks |
Housing Stability and Food Insecurity [65] |
Identify trends in food insecurity by main source of income and housing tenure; determine the impact of one-time increase in social assistance on food insecurity |
Social assistance in Canada= income supplements, healthcare costs and childcare expenses paid for, available for low- income individuals who meet eligibility requirements |
Data from Canadian Community Health Survey, 2005 to 2012; Canadian population aged 12 and over |
Household food insecurity over the prior 12 months |
Overall and moderate food insecurity declined among households on social assistance, but severe food insecurity remained unchanged |
SNAP Program for Food Insecurity [22] |
Examine the associations between household food security and depression and whether these differed by SNAP participation |
SNAP= Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, provides nutrition assistance to millions of low-income individuals and families and provides economic benefits to communities |
3518 adults with household incomes ≤130% of the federal poverty level |
Food insecurity was assessed with the US Household Food Security Survey Module; depression assessed with the 9- item Patient Health Questionnaire |
The overall prevalence of depression was 9.3%, ranging from 6.7% among SNAP nonparticipants to 12.8% among SNAP participants; higher prevalence was observed with worsening food insecurity |
SNAP Program for Food Insecurity [66] |
Investigate the impact of change in SNAP participation status on maternal depression and on perception of government assistance |
See above | Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, N= 256 SNAP- eligible mothers who changed SNAP participation & depression status |
Perceptions of government assistance defined as feelings of humiliation or loss of freedom and tested for interactions with SNAP participation |
Those with positive perceptions of welfare had 0.27 times lower odds of depression when enrolled; for those with negative perceptions of welfare, SNAP enrollment was not associated with depression |
Community Level Programs | |||||
Communities That Care [76] |
Determine whether the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system is a cost-beneficial intervention |
Communities That Care= community mobilization strategy intended to produce community-wide reductions in youth substance use, delinquency, and violence |
Longitudinal panel of 4,407 youth participating in a randomized controlled trial including 24 towns in 7 states |
Alcohol and tobacco use, delinquency rates, long-term cost savings estimation |
CTC produced $4,477 in benefits per youth and cost $556 per youth to implement CTC for 5 years—the net present benefit was $3,920, the benefit- cost ratio was $8.22 per dollar invested |
Bridge to Better Health and Wellness [78] |
Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial impact of the intervention (B2BHW) |
B2BHW= a culturally- adapted health care manager intervention delivered by community health workers for Hispanics with serious mental illness |
34 Hispanics with SMI and at risk for cardiovascular disease |
Examine changes over 12-months on patient activation, self-efficacy, quality of care, receipt of preventive primary care services, and quality of life |
Significant improvements were found for patient activation, self-efficacy, patients’ ratings of quality of care, and receipt of preventive primary care |
Policy Level Programs | |||||
Urban Planning [70] |
Explore the association between green space and depression in a deprived, multiethnic sample of pregnant women |
Green spaces such as parks and gardens around homes, schools, and workplaces have mental and physical health benefits: provide a peaceful place to play, relax, study, or exercise, as well as a social gathering place |
7547 women recruited to the ‘Born in Bradford’ cohort |
Depressive symptoms; 2 green space measures—quintiles of greenness and access to major green spaces |
Pregnant women in the greener quintiles were 18–23% less likely to report depressive symptoms than those in the least green quintile; significant for women who had lower education or were active |
Urban Planning [71] |
Examined the influence of parks on comprehensive measures of subjective wellbeing at the city level |
See above | 2014 data from 44 U.S. cities, from a variety of secondary data sources (e.g., Gallup, Trust for Public Land, U.S. Census Bureau). |
Urban park quantity, quality and self- reported scores on the Gallup-Healthways 1Wellbeing Index (WBI), |
Park quantity was among the strongest predictors of overall wellbeing; the strength of park quality and accessibility were positively associated with wellbeing |
Universal Primary Health Care Access [81] |
Analyze cross- national results of self-reported health and the prevalence of material hardship for adults, which can lead to poor mental health |
U.S. has lack of accessible, comprehensive care for all people; material hardship= an inadequate consumption of goods or services minimally necessary for decent human functioning |
Data from a 2016 telephone survey conducted in 11 countries for noninstitutionalized adults ages 18 and older |
Existence of chronic conditions, coping ability, daily life functioning, financial hardship and emotional well-being |
US adults who reported poor emotional wellbeing were most likely to experience material hardship; in all countries, shortfalls in patient engagement and chronic care management were reported |
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) [67] |
Study the impact of the EITC on various measures of subjective well-being |
EITC= Earned Income Tax Credit, a refundable tax credit for low- to moderate-income working individuals and couples; the benefit depends on a recipient’s income and number of children |
Use the National Survey of Families and Households, first wave N=13,007 adults, second wave N= 10,005 adults |
Depression measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, Evaluative well- being is measured using happiness and self- esteem questions |
The EITC expansion generated well-being improvements; decreased depression, increased happiness and self-esteem for married women compared to unmarried women |