Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Sep 17;20(11):95. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0969-9

Table 1.

Selected interventions targeting social determinants of mental health

Intervention Objective Characteristics of the
intervention
Participants Outcome Variables Main Results
Family, Household and Working Life Interventions

Housing First
[61]
Combine Housing
First with assertive
community treatment
to assist people with
serious mental illness
to exit homelessness
Housing First=
homeless assistance
program, prioritizes
providing permanent
housing before getting a
job or addressing
mental health/
substance use
symptoms
Randomized
control trial with
50 homeless
participants with
serious mental
illness
Housing stability
Community functioning
Housing First participants spent more time
in stable housing, entered housing more
quickly, rated the quality of their housing
more positively, reported higher quality of
life
Housing First
[64]
Compare mental
health service use
among individuals
who received
Housing First vs.
standard care
See above Multi-site
randomized
controlled trial with
2039 severely
mental ill and
homeless
participants
Reported service use
over 24 months
Housing first program decreased use of
inpatient psychiatric hospitals and
increased use of food banks
Housing
Stability and
Food Insecurity
[65]
Identify trends in
food insecurity by
main source of
income and housing
tenure; determine the
impact of one-time
increase in social
assistance on food
insecurity
Social assistance in
Canada= income
supplements, healthcare
costs and childcare
expenses paid for,
available for low-
income individuals who
meet eligibility
requirements
Data from
Canadian
Community Health
Survey, 2005 to
2012; Canadian
population aged 12
and over
Household food
insecurity over the prior
12 months
Overall and moderate food insecurity
declined among households on social
assistance, but severe food insecurity
remained unchanged
SNAP Program
for Food
Insecurity [22]
Examine the
associations between
household food
security and
depression and
whether these
differed by SNAP
participation
SNAP= Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance
Program, provides
nutrition assistance to
millions of low-income
individuals and families
and provides economic
benefits to communities
3518 adults with
household incomes
≤130% of the
federal poverty
level
Food insecurity was
assessed with the US
Household Food
Security Survey
Module; depression
assessed with the 9-
item Patient Health
Questionnaire
The overall prevalence of depression was
9.3%, ranging from 6.7% among SNAP
nonparticipants to 12.8% among SNAP
participants; higher prevalence was
observed with worsening food insecurity
SNAP Program
for Food
Insecurity [66]
Investigate the
impact of change in
SNAP participation
status on maternal
depression and on
perception of
government
assistance
See above Fragile Families
and Child
Wellbeing Study,
N= 256 SNAP-
eligible mothers
who changed
SNAP participation
& depression status
Perceptions of
government assistance
defined as feelings of
humiliation or loss of
freedom and tested for
interactions with SNAP
participation
Those with positive perceptions of welfare
had 0.27 times lower odds of depression
when enrolled; for those with negative
perceptions of welfare, SNAP enrollment
was not associated with depression

Community Level Programs

Communities
That Care [76]
Determine whether
the Communities
That Care (CTC)
prevention system is
a cost-beneficial
intervention
Communities That
Care= community
mobilization strategy
intended to produce
community-wide
reductions in youth
substance use,
delinquency, and
violence
Longitudinal panel
of 4,407 youth
participating in a
randomized
controlled trial
including 24 towns
in 7 states
Alcohol and tobacco
use, delinquency rates,
long-term cost savings
estimation
CTC produced $4,477 in benefits per
youth and cost $556 per youth to
implement CTC for 5 years—the net
present benefit was $3,920, the benefit-
cost ratio was $8.22 per dollar invested
Bridge to Better
Health and
Wellness [78]
Examine the
feasibility,
acceptability, and
initial impact of the
intervention
(B2BHW)
B2BHW= a culturally-
adapted health care
manager intervention
delivered by
community health
workers for Hispanics
with serious mental
illness
34 Hispanics with
SMI and at risk for
cardiovascular
disease
Examine changes over
12-months on patient
activation, self-efficacy,
quality of care, receipt
of preventive primary
care services, and
quality of life
Significant improvements were found for
patient activation, self-efficacy, patients’
ratings of quality of care, and receipt of
preventive primary care

Policy Level Programs

Urban Planning
[70]
Explore the
association between
green space and
depression in a
deprived, multiethnic
sample of pregnant
women
Green spaces such as
parks and gardens
around homes, schools,
and workplaces have
mental and physical
health benefits: provide
a peaceful place to play,
relax, study, or
exercise, as well as a
social gathering place
7547 women
recruited to the
‘Born in Bradford’
cohort 
Depressive symptoms;
2 green space
measures—quintiles of
greenness and access to
major green spaces
Pregnant women in the greener quintiles
were 18–23% less likely to report
depressive symptoms than those in the
least green quintile; significant for women
who had lower education or were active
Urban Planning
[71]
Examined the
influence of parks on
comprehensive
measures of
subjective wellbeing
at the city level
See above 2014 data from 44
U.S. cities, from a
variety of
secondary data
sources (e.g.,
Gallup, Trust for
Public Land, U.S.
Census Bureau).
Urban park quantity,
quality and self-
reported scores on the
Gallup-Healthways
1Wellbeing Index
(WBI),
Park quantity was among the strongest
predictors of overall wellbeing; the
strength of park quality and accessibility
were positively associated with wellbeing
Universal
Primary Health
Care Access
[81]
Analyze cross-
national results of
self-reported health
and the prevalence of
material hardship for
adults, which can
lead to poor mental
health
U.S. has lack of
accessible,
comprehensive care for
all people; material
hardship= an
inadequate
consumption of goods
or services minimally
necessary for decent
human functioning
Data from a 2016
telephone survey
conducted in 11
countries for
noninstitutionalized
adults ages 18 and
older
Existence of chronic
conditions, coping
ability, daily life
functioning, financial
hardship and emotional
well-being
US adults who reported poor emotional
wellbeing were most likely to experience
material hardship; in all countries,
shortfalls in patient engagement and
chronic care management were reported
Earned Income
Tax Credit
(EITC)
[67]
Study the impact of
the EITC on various
measures of
subjective well-being
EITC= Earned Income
Tax Credit,
a refundable tax
credit for low- to
moderate-income
working individuals
and couples; the benefit
depends on a recipient’s
income and number of
children
Use the National
Survey of Families
and Households,
first wave
N=13,007 adults,
second wave
N= 10,005 adults
Depression measured
using the Center for
Epidemiological
Studies Depression
scale, Evaluative well-
being is measured using
happiness and self-
esteem questions
The EITC expansion generated well-being
improvements; decreased depression,
increased happiness and self-esteem for
married women compared to unmarried
women