Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jun 6;66(7):1318–1324. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15413

Table 2.

Attention scores according to BPI pain severity clinical cutpoint groups and interference subscales a in adults aged 71 and older, MOBILIZE Boston Study II

BPI Pain Severity
TEA Subtests c None or least pain Mild pain Moderate to severe pain p-valuea
N Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Telephone Search Test 335 4.83 (2.34) 5.54 (3.62) 5.87 (3.48) 0.03
Map search 334 38.22 (16.41) 33.54 (15.50) 31.22 (13.75) 0.002
The Telephone Search While Counting Test 309 11.26 (14.22) 9.72 (10.52) 14.31 (19.98) 0.37
Dual task decrement score 306 6.78 (13.43) 4.66 (9.61) 9.26 (18.65) 0.52
Visual elevator 298 4.32 (1.16) 4.58 (1.84) 4.50 (1.35) 0.33
BPI Interference
None or least interference Mild interference Moderate to severe interference p-value*
N Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Telephone Search Test 335 4.83(2.23) 5.85(3.97) 6.41(4.37) 0.001
Map search 334 37.66(15.53) 31.45(16.02) 29.67(13.77) 0.001
The Telephone Search While Counting Test 309 10.25(12.57) 10.82(12.04) 14.42(20.05) 0.09
Dual task decrement score 306 5.63(11.72) 5.57(11.18) 9.16(18.72) 0.16
Visual elevator 298 4.38(1.43) 4.64(1.81) 4.57(1.52) 0.27
a

Generalized linear models tested unadjusted associations between BPI clinical cut-points and TEA scores; P-value, test for trend (F test) entering pain severity and interference tertiles as ordinal variables in the models.

b

TEA subtests, 5 scales: selective attention (Telephone Search Test, Map search), sustained attention (The Telephone Search While Counting Test), divided attention (Dual task decrement score) and attentional switching (Visual elevator test).

For all subscales, lower scores indicate better performance except the Map search.

c

BPI Pain Severity clinical cutpoint groups

0–0.99: none or least pain; 1–3.99: mild pain; 4–10: moderate to severe pain