. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jun 6;66(7):1318–1324. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15413

Table 3.

Associations between BPI pain severity and interference scores and attention scores adults aged 71 and older, MOBILIZE Boston Study II

TEA Subtests	Mean (SD)	BPI Pain Severity Score
		Model 1^a		Model 2^b
		Coefficient	p-value	Coefficient	p-value
Telephone Search Test	5.34 (3.21)	0.18	0.04	0.18	0.04
Map search	34.81 (15.72)	−0.98	0.03	−0.84	0.07
The Telephone Search While Counting Test	11.05 (13.90)	0.77	0.06	0.88	0.04
Dual task decrement score	6.17 (12.96)	0.65	0.10	0.74	0.08
Visual elevator	4.47 (1.55)	0.03	0.56	0.02	0.67
TEA Subtests	Mean (SD)	BPI interference score
		Model 1^a		Model 2^b
		Coefficient	p-value	Coefficient	p-value
Telephone Search Test	5.34 (3.21)	0.19	0.03	0.19	0.03
Map search	34.81 (15.72)	−0.75	0.08	−0.65	0.15
The Telephone Search While Counting Test	11.05 (13.90)	0.59	0.14	0.52	0.23
Dual task decrement score	6.17 (12.96)	0.56	0.14	0.49	0.23
Visual elevator	4.47 (1.55)	0.01	0.92	−0.01	0.76

Multiple linear regression models, TEA scores were dependent variables; Model 1 adjusted for age, gender, race,education,

Model 2 additionally adjusted for vision, hand arthritis, diabetes, heart disease, BMI and use of psychiatric drugs