Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;50(9):876–887. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.05.019

Table 4.

Odds ratios from univariate logistic regressions, testing for associations with poor dietary quality (HEI < 51.6) in a sample of 3555 Latinos from NHANES 2007–2008 and 2009–2010, adjusted for sampling cluster and strata.

Effect n P value Odds Ratio* 95% Wald CL
High School Education
Less than HS 1891 .13 1.11 0.97 1.28
At least HS 1664 -- -- -- --
Age, years
18 – 34 (ref) 1172 -- -- -- --
35–55 1288 <.001 0.66 0.57 0.78
> 55 1095 <.001 0.47 0.38 0.58
Sex
Male 1879 <.001 1.54 1.27 1.87
Female (ref) 1676 -- -- -- --
BMI
Underweight 30 .17 1.65 0.82 3.34
Normal 803 -- -- -- --
Overweight 1349 .91 1.03 0.84 1.28
Obese 1336 .99 1.02 0.86 1.22
Country of Origin
Other Latino (ref) 2330 .08 0.81 0.65 1.02
Mexican 1325 -- -- --
Nutrition Label Use
At least sometimes 2890 .001 0.70 0.57 0.85
Rarely or never (ref) 665 -- -- --
Poverty Income Ratio < 130%
Yes 1842 .10 1.18 0.96 1.44
No (ref) 1713 -- -- --
Language Spoken at Home
Spanish 1809 .58 1.08 0.82 1.41
English (ref) 1746 -- -- --
*

Significant (p<.05) effects are in bold.