Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;45(10):4704–4710. doi: 10.1002/mp.13126

Table 1.

Summary of the regression and paired t‐test analyses comparing ATD sizes to lesion sizes measured on T1‐ and T2‐weighted MR images

MRI sequence ATD (CEM) Regression slope Regression R 2 ATD — lesion mean (mm) ATD — Lesion SD (mm) t‐test P‐value 95% CI lower (mm) 95% CI upper (mm)
T1‐weighted 17 1.53 0.34 3.0 1.4 <0.005 2.6 3.3
40 1.32 0.48 1.8 1.0 <0.005 1.5 2.0
100 1.14 0.54 0.8 0.9 <0.005 0.6 1.0
200 1.00 0.60 0.1 0.8 0.44 −0.1 0.3
240 0.96 0.66 ‐0.1 0.7 0.09 −0.3 0.0
T2‐weighted 17 1.33 0.42 2.1 1.3 <0.005 1.8 2.4
40 1.14 0.54 0.9 1.0 <0.005 0.7 1.2
100 0.98 0.58 −0.1 0.9 0.64 −0.3 0.2
200 0.87 0.64 −0.8 0.8 <0.005 −1.0 −0.6
240 0.84 0.69 −1.0 0.7 <0.005 −1.2 −0.8

R 2 = coefficient of determination, SD = standard deviation, CI = confidence interval.