Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;45(10):4558–4567. doi: 10.1002/mp.13147

Table 2.

Comparison of segmentation accuracy between the state‐of‐the‐art methods and our method (Dice %), bold fonts indicate the best performer for that structure

Organ/method Atlas‐based5 Model‐based37 CNN24 FCNN(our) FCNN+SRM(our)
Brainstem 82 87 ± 4 Unavailable 82.86 ± 2.68 86.97 ± 2.95
Chiasm Unavailable 35 ± 16 37.4 ± 13.4 46.19 ± 8.35 58.35 ± 10.28
Mandible 89 91 ± 2 89.5 ± 3.6 92.07 ± 1.15 93.67 ± 1.21
Left optic nerve Unavailable 63 ± 5 63.9 ± 6.9 60.66 ± 9.01 65.31 ± 5.75
Right optic nerve Unavailable 63 ± 5 64.5 ± 7.5 61.94 ± 4.63 68.89 ± 4.74
Left parotid 82 82 ± 10 76.6 ± 6.1 81.69 ± 3.23 83.49 ± 2.29
Right parotid 82 82 ± 10 77.9 ± 5.4 81.31 ± 5.88 83.18 ± 1.45
Left Submandibular 69 78 ± 8 69.7 ± 13.3 71.55 ± 5.51 75.48 ± 6.49
Right submandibular 69 78 ± 8 73.0 ± 9.2 76.7 ± 7.31 81.31 ± 6.45