. 2018 Feb 28;17(4):582–587. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1098-z

Table 2.

Reconstructed area (%), raw roughness (Ra), and radiation dose (mSv) values for the bone specimen and each 3D model

	Reconstructed area	Roughness	Radiation dose
Specimen	100.000^A	2.288^A
CB 0.2	89.042^B	7.870^BCD	2.450^A
CB 0.25	89.797^B	8.470^D	2.380^A
CB 0.3	58.930^C	7.160^BCD	1.230^B
CT-16 0.625	99.880^A	7.300^BCD	9.900^DE
CT-16 1.25	98.172^A	6.330^B	9.680^CDE
CT-16 2.5	85.953^B	6.970^BCD	11.600^E
CT-64 0.75	97.623^A	7.140^BCD	6.410^CD
CT-64 1.0	98.875^A	6.610^BC	8.065^CD
CT-64 1.5	96.032^A	8.130^CD	7.980^CD

CB cone beam computed tomography, CT-16 fan beam computed tomography 16-channel, CT-64 fan beam computed tomography 64-channel. CT devices are followed by voxel size. Numbers followed by upper case letters indicate comparisons among the 3D models. Different letters indicate the statistical difference at p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test