Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 20;17(4):520–530. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1075-y

Table 2.

Differences in junior’s responses on low dose and high doses for quantitative variables

Differential LD-HD
Median [Min.; Max.] (p value)
M1 M2 M3 M4
J1 − 0.1 [− 5.2; 1.2]
(0.415)
0 [− 2.9; 0.7]
(0.492)
0 [− 0.4; 0.9]
(0.503)
0.05 [− 0.2; 0.5]
(0.339)
J2 0 [− 5; 1.1]
(0.683)
0 [− 1.7; 1.1]
(0.863)
0.1 [− 0.4; 0.3]
(0.426)
0.1 [− 0.2; 0.6]
(0.193)
J3 0.05 [− 4.9; 0.8]
(0.943)
0 [− 2.8; 1.3]
(0.447)
0 [− 1; 9.1]
(0.905)
0.1 [− 0.2; 0.5]
(0.117)
J4 0 [− 5.2; 0.6]
(0.538)
− 0.05 [− 5; 1.8]
(0.190)
− 0.5 [− 0.9; 0.3]
(0.554)
0.1 [− 0.4; 0.5]
(0.155)
J5 0 [− 5.2; 2.9]
(0.909)
− 0.1 [− 1.2; 0.8]
(0.034)*
0.05 [− 0.2; 0.7]
(0.320)
0.1 [− 0.3; 0.6]
(0.044)

LD low dose, HD high dose, Min. minimum, Max. maximum, J1 first junior assessor, J2 second junior assessor; etc., M1 maxillary alveolar bone height, M2 maxillary alveolar bone width, M3 mandibular alveolar bone height, M4 mandibular alveolar bone width

P values of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests comparing LD to HD presented in Italics