Table 4.
Concordance in junior’s responses on low dose and high doses for qualitative variables
| Percent concordance (p value) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (N = 36) | Q2 (N = 36) | Q3 (N = 36) | Q4 (N = 36) | Q5 (N = 12) | Q6 (N = 12) | Q7 (N = 12) | |
| J1 | 72.2% (1.000) | 75.0% (0.278) | 83.3% (< 0.001**) | 80.6% (NC) | 50.0% (1.000) | 66.7% (0.205) | 66.7% (0.205) |
| J2 | 72.2% (1.000) | 75.0% (0.057) | 61.1% (0.176) | 83.3% (0.121) | 50.0% (1.000) | 66.7% (1.000) | 50.0% (1.000) |
| J3 | 75.0% (0.076) | 86.1% (< 0.001**) | 88.9% (< 0.001**) | 75.0% (0.541) | 50.0% (1.000) | 91.7% (0.167) | 66.7% (0.208) |
| J4 | 97.2% (NC) | 86.1% (1.000) | 69.4% (0.124) | 100.0% (NC) | 50.0% (1.000) | 83.3% (NC) | 58.3% (0.576) |
| J5 | 83.3% (NC) | 77.8% (0.535) | 94.4% (< 0.001**) | 94.4% (0.083) | 58.3% (1.000) | 75.0% (0.333) | 75.0% (0.081) |
NC not calculable, J1 first junior assessor, J2 second junior assessor, etc., Q1 question 1, Q2 question 2, etc. P values of Chi-square tests comparing LD to HD presented in Italics
** Statistically significant at p < 0.01