Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;8:215. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0271-y

Table 1.

Logistic regression analysis of VEGFA SNPs in probands and control subjects

Genotype Allele
N (%) OR 95% CI p value Adj p value N (%) OR 95% CI p value Adj p value p of HWEa
rs699947 GG GT TT GG T-
 Controls 40 (35) 49 (43) 26 (22) 0.89 0.56–1.43 40 (35) 75 (65) 0.15
 Probands 169 (38) 185 (41) 92 (21) 0.84 0.48–1.46 0.80 0.79 169 (38) 277 (62) 0.87 0.57–1.34 0.54 0.56
rs833070 GG AG AA GG A-
 Controls 37 (29) 64 (51) 25 (20) 0.67 0.43–1.05 37 (29) 89 (71) 0.78
 Probands 176 (37) 204 (42) 99 (21) 0.83 0.47–1.46 0.21 0.23 176 (37) 303 (63) 0.72 0.47–1.10 0.12 0.12
rs2146323 CC AC AA CC A-
 Controls 47 (40) 64 (54) 7 (6) 0.56 0.37–0.85 47 (40) 71 (60) 0.01
 Probands 242 (51) 184 (38) 53 (11) 1.47 0.63–3.43 0.005* 0.007* 242 (51) 237 (49) 0.65 0.43–0.98 0.037 0.042

VEGFA vascular endothelial growth factor A, SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, N number, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, HWE Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium

*Survived Bonferroni correction; Adj p value covaried for age, sex, race

aHWE test was carried out in controls

The bolded values stand for signficant uncorreted p values (p < 0.05)