Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;41(9):830–841. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2018.0181

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazard models for prognostic factors

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (≥60 vs. < 60) 0.987 (0.442–2.204) 0.974
Gender (female vs. male) 1.153 (0.538–2.472) 0.714
Tumour size (≥5 vs. < 5) 1.535 (0.737–3.198) 0.252
AFP (≥20 vs. < 20) 1.361 (0.679–2.729) 0.385
TNM stage (III+IV vs. I+II) 2.351 (1.127–4.902) 0.023* 2.753 (1.394–5.437) 0.004
HBV infection (Yes vs. No) 1.014 (0.468–2.199) 0.972
Cirrhosis (Yes vs. No) 3.643 (1.581–8.390) 0.002** 3.139 (1.540–6.399) 0.002**
Metastasis (Yes vs. No) 2.120 (1.028–4.369) 0.042* 2.521 (1.320–4.814) 0.005**
miR-766-3p (low vs. high) 3.699 (1.793–7.629) < 0.001** 3.691 (1.815–7.506) < 0.001*
*

Statistically significant (P < 0.05),

**

Statistically significant (P < 0.01).