Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;19(7):880–893. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0897-2

Table 2.

Measures of parent and family characteristics, participation barriers, program factors and contextual factors

Variable Measure Data collection
Source Collecteda
Parent and family factors
 Demographics Parent and child age and gender, family structure and size, parent education, employment status, household income, government benefits, language spoken at home Parent Baseline
 Life event stress List of Threatening Experiences (LTE-Q): 7-item yes/no list of stressful life events in last 12 months (Brugha and Cragg 1990), e.g. “You had a major financial difficulty”. Total score 0 to 7 Parent Baseline
 Parent global self-efficacy 1 item on a 5-point scale, overall efficacy as a parent (Zubrick et al. 2014), “Overall, as a parent, do you feel that you are…?”, e.g. “a better than average parent”, producing a score between 1 and 5 Parent Baseline
 Psychosocial distress Kessler-6 (K6): 6-item psychosocial screener on a 5-point scale assessing emotional distress in the last 4 weeks (Kessler et al. 2002). “About how often did you feel…?”, e.g. “nervous”. Total score 0 to 24 Parent Baseline
 Seeing other services Use of early childhood services: 1 item “Have you or your child seen anyone other than your maternal and child health nurse in relation to your own health or your child’s health or behaviour?” Parent Baseline
Participation barriers
 Family Family barriers to attendance: 4 yes/no items; e.g. difficulties with child health Parent Post
 Logistical Logistic barriers to attendance: 4 yes/no items; e.g. difficulties with transport Parent Post
 Program Program barriers to attendance: 3 yes/no items; e.g. difficulty relating to other parents in the group Parent Post
Program factors
 Group climate 6 items: level of rapport, time management, achievement of session goals, group cohesiveness, active participation by the group (5-point scale: 1 = much less than expected, 5 = much better than expected) and disruption of session by unanticipated events (5-point scale: 1 = none, 5 = extensive disruption) Facilitator Weekly
Contact with parent between sessions: 1 item (yes/no) Facilitator Weekly
 Facilitator Demographics: age, gender, qualifications, experience in early childhood sector/parenting support Facilitator Pre-training
Confidence in skills/competency: 6 skills, e.g. “Identifying specific needs of families” on a 5-point scale from 1 = ‘no level of skill/knowledge in the area’ to 5 = ‘advanced level of skill/knowledge’ Facilitator Post-training
Preparedness to deliver smalltalk: 5 items (e.g. How confident do you feel to be able to communicate the parenting strategies to parents?) 5-point scale (1 = not at all, 5 = very). Total score 5 to 25 Facilitator Post-training
Contextual factors
 Area/population Census of Population and Housing data (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2011) including geographic area (km2), population size and density; number of children 0–4 years; rate of language other than English spoken at home; rate of unemployment; number of households without a motor vehicle
 Neighbourhood disadvantage Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA: Australian Bureau of Statistics 2011)
Proportion of children in the ‘developmentally vulnerable’ range (lowest 10% nationally) for language, cognitive and general knowledge, Australian Early Development Census (AEDC 2015)

aWeekly = recorded by facilitator at end of each group session; Baseline (T = 0); Post = after program completion (T = 12 weeks); Pre/post-training = immediately before/after facilitator training