Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;53(10):1081–1090. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1548-4

Table 1.

Study characteristics of the longitudinal analytic sample

Study dataa
Longitudinal measures Mean n
Number of depressive symptoms during the past week (0–8)
 Wave 1 (2002/2003) 1.6 11,037
 Wave 2 (2004/2005) 1.6 8519
 Wave 3 (2006/2007) 1.5 7248
 Wave 4 (2008/2009) 1.4 6300
 Wave 5 (2010/2011) 1.5 5843
 Wave 6 (2012/2013) 1.3 5291
 Wave 7 (2014/2015) 1.4 4571
Baseline measures Mean or % n
Perceived social cohesion score (0–24)
 High (22–24) 35.3 3896
 Medium (18–21) 32.5 3587
 Low (0–17) 32.2 3554
Baseline age 65.2 11,037
Female 53.7 5927
Non-white 2.7 298
Self-reported ever doctor-diagnosis of depression 5.4 596
No educational qualification 43.1 4757
Economic activity
 Employed 33.1 3653
 Retired 49.9 5507
 Economically inactive 7.4 817
 Permanently sick/disabled 9.6 1060
Total non-pension wealth
 1 (wealthiest) 19.7 2174
 2 19.8 2185
 3 20.1 2218
 4 20.2 2230
 5 20.2 2230
Self-rated health
 Very good 20.0 2207
 Good 33.9 3742
 Fair 27.6 3046
 Poor 18.5 2042
Self-reported limiting long-term illness 34.3 3786

aThe estimates are averaged over the multiply imputed data sets, and corrected for the study’s non-response at wave 1. The longitudinal analytic sample (n = 11,037) includes participants with varying observations of valid data on depressive symptoms across waves