Table 3.
Multinomial logistic regression predicting practitioners’ ratings of father attendance (N = 479)
| Categories | B | S.E. | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Fathers often/always attend sessions | Intercept | −4.80 | 1.09 | 0.000 | |||
| Confidence in working with Fathers | 1.05 | 0.36 | 0.003 | 2.87 | 1.42 | 5.81 | |
| Perceived effectiveness of engagement strategies | −0.38 | 0.26 | 0.145 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 1.14 | |
| Competence in using engagement strategies | −0.65 | 0.35 | 0.063 | 0.52 | 0.26 | 1.04 | |
| Frequency of strategy use | 0.76 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 2.14 | 1.39 | 3.29 | |
| Organizational practices for father engagement | 0.71 | 0.17 | 0.000 | 2.04 | 1.46 | 2.85 | |
| Fathers sometimes attend sessions | Intercept | −0.17 | 0.81 | 0.834 | |||
| Confidence in working with fathers | 0.44 | 0.27 | 0.103 | 1.55 | 0.91 | 2.64 | |
| Perceived efectiveness of engagement strategies | −0.52 | 0.19 | 0.008 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.87 | |
| Competence in using engagement strategies | −0.31 | 0.26 | 0.229 | 0.73 | 0.44 | 1.22 | |
| Frequency of strategy use | 0.42 | 0.16 | 0.009 | 1.53 | 1.11 | 2.10 | |
| Organizational practices for father engagement | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.016 | 1.36 | 1.06 | 1.75 |
The reference category is ‘Fathers never/rarely attend sessions