Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 13;48(11):3773–3782. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3626-6

Table 6.

Logistic regression analysis, using ‘no alcohol’ category subdivisions

MACP ASD cases Model A Model B Model C Model D Model E
Never drinks alcohol (teetotal) 34 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Drinks alcohol but gave up during pregnancy 112 1.14 (0.75, 1.74) 1.17 (0.72, 1.89) 0.95 (0.61, 1.48) 1.16 (0.7, 1.92) 1 (0.58, 1.74)
Light 44 0.79 (0.47, 1.34) 0.81 (0.44, 1.49) 0.77 (0.43, 1.38) 0.8 (0.43, 1.48) 0.79 (0.4, 1.56)
Moderate 9 0.86 (0.35, 2.14) 1.05 (0.37, 2.96) 0.77 (0.28, 2.13) 0.89 (0.32, 2.51) 0.89 (0.31, 2.6)
Heavy 6 1.33 (0.49, 3.6) 1.74 (0.56, 5.45) 1.1 (0.4, 3.06) 1.6 (0.56, 4.61) 1.55 (0.52, 4.59)

“Never drinks alcohol (teetotal)” group as reference group

Model A (crude analysis)

Model B (parental age): maternal age, paternal age

Model C (socioeconomic/demographic factors): household income, maternal education, social deprivation, ethnicity, marital status

Model D (maternal health factors): maternal smoking, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, depression treatment

Model E (combined): household income, ethnicity, maternal smoking, BMI