Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;28(11):4748–4756. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5487-y

Table 3.

Comparison of variables in patients with and without PHLF

Overall, n = 62 No PHLF, n = 46 PHLF, n = 16 p value
Established clinical variables
 PDR, % 24.2 (18.0–27.7) 25.0 (18.0–30.3) 21.2 (17.8–24.7) 0.082
 R15, % 4.0 (1.58–6.25) 2.75 (1.0–6.0) 4.25 (3.55–7.0) 0.075
Established MDCT variables
 FLR, ml 686.03 (497.67–931.02) 746.5 (563.7–986.0) 466.5 (403.4–736.0) 0.005
 Proportion of FLR, % 41.5 (34.55–60.87) 49.3 (36.2–64.8) 33.9 (28.4–37.4) < 0.001
 Weight-adapted FLR, ml/kg 8.47 (6.73–12.89) 10.16 (7.45–13.93) 6.62 (5.31–8.0) < 0.001
Established gadoxetic acid enhanced variable
 remnantRLE 1.21 (0.93–1.54) 1.35 (1.04–1.66) 0.91 (0.81–1.09) 0.001
Functional volume
 functFLR, ml/kg 10.92 (7.26–17.59) 12.93 (8.69–22.2) 6.44 (4.65–7.57) < 0.001

Data are presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQR)

PHLF post-hepatectomy liver failure, PDR plasma disappearance rate, R15 median retention rate at 15 min, MDCT multidetector CT, FLR future liver remnant, remnantRLE mean relative enhancement of the FLR, functFLR functional future liver remnant