Skip to main content
. 2018 May 30;2(2):bjgpopen18X101541. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101541

Table 1. Patient sex and age distributions in ID and non-ID group encounters.

ID group patients
(n = 690)
Non-ID group patients
(n = 970 641)
  (%) 95% CI (%) 95% CI
Sex
(Missing data: ID, n = 9;
non-ID, n = 6968)
Male 348 (51.1) 47.2 to 55.0 392 719 (40.8) 40.5 to 41.0
Female 333 (48.9) 45.0 to 52.8 570 954 (59.2) 59.0 to 59.5
Age group, years <5 26 (3.8) 2.3 to 5.3 61 753 (6.4) 6.3 to 6.5
5–14 78 (11.3) 8.6 to 14.0 51 987 (5.4) 5.3 to 5.4
15–24 104 (15.1) 12.0 to 18.1 86 392 (8.9) 8.8 to 9.0
25–44 223 (32.3) 28.6 to 36.0 226 095 (23.3) 23.1 to 23.5
45–64 212 (30.7) 26.8 to 34.7 269 729 (27.8) 27.6 to 28.0
65–74 30 (4.3) 2.7 to 6.0 123 370 (12.7) 12.6 to 12.9
≥75 17 (2.5) 1.2 to 3.7 151 315 (15.6) 15.3 to 15.8

There are highly significant differences between the ID and non-ID groups:

For sex: P< 0.001; Rao-Scott χ2 adjusted for GP cluster effect (RS-χ2) 28.7; 1 df.

For age-group: P<0.001; RS-χ2 186.6; 4 df.

Encounters with missing age data excluded from above table: ID 11/701; non-ID 8058/978 699.

CI = confidence intervals. ID = intellectual disability.