Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 25;69(21):5117–5130. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery273

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phenotype of the MIM156f OE plants. (A) The appearances of the MIM156fOE, WT, and cd mutant plants (left to right). (B) The plant heights and tiller numbers of the MIM156fOE plants in comparison with the WT plants (n=20). (C) Appearance of the stems of the MIM156fOE, WT, and cd mutant plants, showing the numbered internodes I, II, III, IV. (D) Lengths of each internode in the MIM156fOE, WT, and cd mutant plants (n=10). The asterisks in (B) and (D) represent a significant difference, as determined by a Student’s t-test at *P<0.05 and **P<0.01, respectively. (E) The basal region of the stems of the cd mutant, WT, and MIM156fOE plants (left to right).