Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 25;69(21):5117–5130. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery273

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Characterization of MIM156fOE/GH3.8OE and cd/GH3.8R hybrid plants. (A) Appearance of representative WT, MIM156fOE, GH3.8OE-3, and hybrid MIM156fOE/GH3.8OE-3 plants (left to right). (B) Plant height and tiller number of the MIM156fOE/GH3.8OE-3 hybrid and genetically related plants (n=20). (C) OsGH3.8 expression in the MIM156fOE/GH3.8OE-3 plant and its parent lines (n=3). (D) Plant height and tiller number phenotypes of the cd mutant, the cd/GH3.8R hybrid, and the GH3.8R and WT plants (left to right). (E) Plant height and tiller number of the cd/GH3.8R hybrid as compared with the cd mutant and WT (n=10). The asterisks in (B), (C), and (E) represent a significant difference, as determined by a Student’s t-test at *P<0.05 and **P<0.01, respectively.