Table 2.
Agreement between scoring modalities relative to MRI Pfirrmann grade cut-off
| Compared modalities | Pfirrmann grade ≥ 1 |
Pfirrmann grade ≥ 2 |
Pfirrmann grade ≥ 3 |
Pfirrmann grade ≥ 4 |
Pfirrmann grade = 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiography vs. CT | 64.2% (58.5–69.4) | 64.4% (58.5–69.9) | 65.6% (58.0–72.5) | 67.0% (59.0–74.2) | 67.1% (58.9–74.3) |
| Radiography vs. MRI | 20.1% (16.2–24.6) | 46.4% (40.1–52.8) | 80.8% (75.1–85.4) | 85.4% (80.3–89.3) | 83.9% (78.4–88.2) |
| CT vs. MRI | 45.9% (39.9–52.0) | 51.1% (44.6–57.5) | 62.8% (54.8–70.0) | 64.9% (56.5–72.4) | 62.8% (54.2–70.7) |
Model estimates (95% CI) of pairwise agreement between scoring modalities for each MRI Pfirrmann grade cut-off used to binarize data into a ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ score for intervertebral disc (IVD) calcification
CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging