Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;12(4):310–315. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5422

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of recruited patients


PCOS-IR n=20 PCOS-IS n=20 Control n=20 P value

Age (Y) 30.04 ± 4.45 28.00 ± 4.00 29.05 ± 5.18 0.381
Previous ART
Yes 7 (25.9) 7 (25.9) 13 (48.2) 0.108
No 15 (42.9) 12 (34.3) 8 (22.8)
Fasting insulin (mg/dl) 19.30 ± 9.60 6.67 ± 2.89 - 0.006
BMI 29.97 ± 4.39a 26.31 ± 8.03ab 25.12 ± 4.21b 0.023
Oocyte retrievedMIIMIGVDegenerated/dead 11.90 ± 7.098.01 ± 3.61a0 (0-3; 1)0 (0-2; 0)0 (0-1; 0) 13.58 ± 11.269.05 ± 3.37ab0 (0-2; 0)0 (0-4; 1)0 (0-4; 1) 12.90 ± 5.59111.57 ± 5.11b0 (0-1; 1)0 (0-3; 1)0 (0-2; 0.5) 0.8140.0280.8060.4680.125
Total embryo 7.15 ± 4.29 9.44 ± 7.34 7.95 ± 4.07 0.415
2PN embryos 6 (0-14; 4.75) 7 (1-13; 3.25) 9 (2-18; 4.5) 0.723
Fertilization (%) 73.28 ± 25.43 75.90 ± 25.89 76.01 ± 17.24 0.914

PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome, IR; Insulin resistant, IS; Insulin sensitive, ART; Assisted reproductive technology, BMI; Body mass index, MI; Metaphase I oocytes, MII; Metaphase II oocytes, GV; Germinal vesicle stage, 2PN; Two pronuclei. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD or median (minimum-maximum; inter-quartile range) when appropriate. Categorical variables are presented as number (%). Different letters indicate significantly different means (as evaluated by ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test). A P<0.05 was considered significant.