Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Aug 16;106(4):996–1004. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.157396

Table 2. Tests for mediation of the BMI-genetic risk score (BMI-GRS) to BMI association by Emotional eating and Uncontrolled eating.

BMI-GRS to TFEQ TFEQ to BMI BMI-GRS to BMI BMI-GRS to BMI (adj. for TFEQ) Sobel test P-val. Mediation ratio (%)

Effect size (95%CI) P-val. Effect size (95%CI) P-val. Effect size (95%CI) P-val. Effect size (95%CI) P-val.
Emotional eating
     EDEN (n=2154) 0.06 (0.01, 0.10) 0.01 1.22 (1.04, 1.39) <1×10-10 0.62 (0.44, 0.80) <1×10-10 0.55 (0.38, 0.72) 4×10-10 0.01 10.8%
     Fenland (n=3515) 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) 0.02 1.78 (1.63, 1.94) <1×10-10 0.70 (0.54, 0.85) <1×10-10 0.63 (0.48, 0.78) <1×10-10 0.02 10.0%
Uncontrolled eating
     EDEN (n=2154) 0.04 (0.00, 0.09) 0.04 0.92 (0.74, 1.10) <1×10-10 0.62 (0.44, 0.80) <1×10-10 0.58 (0.40, 0.75) 1×10-10 0.04 6.4%
     Fenland (n=3515) 0.06 (0.03, 0.09) 5×10-4 1.50 (1.35, 1.65) <1×10-10 0.70 (0.54, 0.85) <1×10-10 0.61 (0.46, 0.76) <1×10-10 6×10-4 12.0%

Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals are from least squares linear regression models. All models were adjusted for age, sex and (in EDEN) recruitment centre

The BMI-GRS and TFEQ scores were all standardised to z-scores (mean=0; SD=1)