Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 1;110(10):1094–1101. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy021

Table 1.

Validation of the prognostic value of Clinseq-DK, M, G models in the TCGA cohort

Model C-index (95% CI) Integrated Brier score iAUC* HR (95% CI) Bayes_factor (x vs ELN3 as reference) Bayes_factor (Clinseq-G vs other model)
ELN 0.64 (0.55 to 0.73) 0.19 0.65 NA NA 26.78
Li 0.65 (0.59 to 0.72) 0.16 0.70 2.87 (1.77 to 4.67) 6.09 4.41
Patel 0.68 (0.59 to 0.77) 0.17 0.68 NA 8.90 5.94
Clinseq-DK 0.60 (0.53 to 0.67) 0.18 0.63 1.80 (1.12 to 2.87) 0.63 34.71
Clinseq-M 0.56 (0.49 to 0.64) 0.20 0.59 0.93 (0.59 to 1.47) 0.13 124.00
Clinseq-G 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74) 0.17 0.73 2.42 (1.51 to 3.88) 26.78 NA
*

Integrated area under the curve of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic. C-index = concordance index; CI = confidence interval; ELN = the European LeukemiaNet risk stratification system; HR = hazard ratio; iAUC = integrated area under the curve; NA = not applicable; TCGA = The Cancer Genome Atlas.