Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 28;110(10):1048–1058. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy189

Table 3.

Blood and solid cancer studies examining the effect of cancer treatment on telomere length (N = 4)

Reference Cancer type(s) Study design Cancer patient sample size Age Range, y Treatment type Specimen Telomere length method Overall association
Adult
Diker-Cohen et al., 2013 (34) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colon, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma Longitudinal 42 45–74 Chemo: varied based on cancer type PBMC Flow-FISH Shorter telomere length with treatment†
Kronenwett et al., 1996 (49) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, breast cancer, rhabdomyosarcoma Cross-sectional* 54 22–60 Chemo: varied based on cancer type; G-CSF PB stem cells; mononuclear cells TRF analysis No association
Pediatric
Franco et al., 2003 (50) Acute lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, hepatoblastoma, clear cell sarcoma, neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, brainstem tumor, astrocytoma, severe aplastic anemia Longitudinal 24 0.7–16 Chemo: varied based on cancer type, radiation, autologous stem cells PBMC or bone marrow mononuclear cells and granulocytes TRF analysis Shorter PB telomere length with treatment, primarily among solid tumor patients and not hematological cancer patients
Engelhardt et al., 1998 (51) Acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, sarcoma, Wilms tumor, Hodgkin lymphoma, Central nervous system tumors, hepatoblastoma, germ cell Longitudinal 25 1–15 Chemo: varied based on cancer type PBMC and bone marrow mononuclear cells and granulocytes TRF analysis Shorter telomere length with treatment
*

No pretreatment sample measured for telomere length. FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization; G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; PB = peripheral blood; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; TRF = terminal restriction fragment.

Result statistically significant.