Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;5:25. doi: 10.1186/s40658-018-0224-9

Table 7.

Correlation between body size predictors, eGFR, and the IA per renal absorbed dose (GBq/Gy) at the first induction cycle (n = 77)

Correlation a Linear regression slope Relative error (%)
3TP 2TP 3TP 2TP 3TP 2TP
r P r P
Weight (Kg) 0.13 0.25 0.13 0.26 0.026 0.026 2.3
[−46.0–66.6]
(− 61.5–165.7)
2.0
[−47.0–66.3]
(− 62.6–168.8)
LBW (Kg) 0.18 0.12 0.17 0.13 0.037 0.036 5.6
[−38.4–73.9]
(− 58.4–190.4)
6.8
[− 39.4–71.0]
(− 59.6–193.7)
BSA (m2) 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.13 1.09 1.07 7.4
[−38.2–73.5]
(− 53.5–227.7)
6.9
[− 39.1–76.8]
(− 54.8–231.5)
eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 0.34 0.002 0.36 0.001 0.022 0.021 1.0
[− 36.2–70.2]
(− 61.2–164.1)
1.5
[− 36.2–71.9]
(− 61.1–173.3)
eGFR · weight 0.34 0.002 0.35 0.002 0.00026 0.00026 −1.9
[− 46.7–63.8]
(− 62.9–124.4)
−2.7
[− 45.9–61.7]
(− 62.8–123.3)
eGFR · LBW 0.40 0.0003 0.41 0.0002 0.00037 0.00036 −0.3
[− 43.0–57.1]
(− 67.6–140.2)
0.8
[− 43.4–58.3]
(− 67.5–139.0)
eGFR · BSA 0.38 0.0008 0.39 0.0005 0.012 0.012 − 0.0
[−36.2–70.2]
(− 63.8–128.2)
− 0.7
[− 36.9–70.1]
(− 63.7–127.3)

BSA body surface area, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, LBW lean body weight, TP time points

Relative error data is presented as median [interdecile range] (range)

aSpearman’s correlation