Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;12:710. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00710

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) Orientation target discrimination accuracy (proportion correct) in different stimulus size and eccentricity conditions. (B) The similar results were found when participants' sensitivity was analyzed. (C) Response bias varied along sensitivity, demonstrating an association between higher sensitivity and “same” response tendency. (D) Widths of the attentional suppressive surrounds. The sizes of the attentional suppressive surrounds in the large and small (far) orientation conditions did not statistically differ. Small (near) orientation condition produced a narrower suppressive surround compared to the other conditions. Error bars indicate SEM.