Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;67(9):1379–1387. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy302

Table 1.

Genetic Relatedness of 640 New Clostridium difficile Infection Cases to Any Previous Isolate

Type of Relationship/Contact Same Ribotype 0 SNV 0–2 SNV 3–10 SNV 0–10 SNV
Relationship to all previous study isolates at this threshold 567 (89%) 162 (25%) 227 (35%) 127 (20%) 354 (55%)
Genetically linked to any previous case on the same ward at the same time 164 (26%) 91 (14%) 115 (18%) 9 (1%) 124 (19%)
 Within plausible infectious and incubation periodsa 139 (22%) 84 (13%) 105 (16%) 6 (1%) 111 (17%)
Genetically linked to any previous case on the same ward at a different time 144 (23%) 20 (3%) 30 (5%) 34 (5%) 64 (10%)
 Within 4 wk 54 (8%) 13 (2%) 16 (3%) 9 (1%) 25 (4%)
Plausible community contact 83 (13%) 8 (1%) 13 (2%) 8 (1%) 21 (3%)
 Shared general practice 27 (4%) 4 (1%) 10 (2%) 1 (0%) 11 (2%)
 Postcode district 77 (12%) 8 (1%) 11 (2%) 9 (1%) 20 (3%)
Genetically related but no contact of any kind identified 176 (28%) 43 (7%) 69 (11%) 76 (12%) 145 (23%)
 CA/I 67 (10%) 12 (2%) 21 (3%) 32 (5%) 53 (8%)

Prior contact considered in order shown (same ward same time (direct), same ward different time (spore), community) with the exception of any spore contamination lasting <28 days which was considered more plausible than direct transmission outside 56-day donor infectious period and 90-day recipient incubation periods.

Abbreviations: CA, community associated; CDI, Clostridium difficile infection; I, indeterminate; SNV, single nucleotide variants.

aFifty-six–day donor infectious period and 90-day recipient incubation [18].