Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;63(10):692–700. doi: 10.1177/0706743718762099

Table 2.

Adjusted predictors (relative risk) of treatment access in relation to screening results.a

Total Clinical/history-taking detection Screening yield Screen negative
Men REF REF REF REF
Women 1.72 [1.57, 1.88] 2.04 [1.80, 2.31] 2.05 [1.53, 2.75] 2.02 [1.52, 2.70]
White REF REF REF REF
Indigenous 1.03 [0.95, 1.12] 1.03 [0.92, 1.15] 1.29 [1.05, 1.60] 1.09 [0.90, 1.34]
Black 0.41 [0.34, 0.49] 0.41 [0.32, 0.52] 0.27 [0.16, 0.45] 0.35 [0.24, 0.53]
Other 0.55 [0.48, 0.64] 0.43 [0.34, 0.54] 0.62 [0.43, 0.88] 0.62 [0.46, 0.85]
Atlantic REF REF REF REF
Quebec 0.64 [0.57, 0.72] 0.49 [0.41, 0.58] 0.52 [0.39, 0.70] 1.07 [0.77, 1.50]
Ontario 1.35 [1.22, 1.51] 1.30 [1.13, 1.50] 1.21 [0.90, 1.63] 2.22 [1.58, 3.12]
Prairie 0.89 [0.80, 0.99] 0.72 [0.62, 0.83] 0.83 [0.63, 1.11] 1.72 [1.24, 2.39]
Pacific 0.55 [0.47, 0.65] 0.54 [0.44, 0.67] 0.43 [0.28, 0.68] 0.79 [0.50, 1.26]
18-24 REF REF REF REF
25-39 1.05 [0.96, 1.14] 1.09 [0.96, 1.23] 1.07 [0.85, 1.34] 1.02 [0.83, 1.26]
40-54 1.04 [0.94, 1.15] 1.06 [0.92, 1.22] 1.10 [0.85, 1.41] 1.01 [0.79, 1.29]
55+ 0.92 [0.80, 1.06] 0.77 [0.61, 0.95] 0.88 [0.61, 1.27] 1.08 [0.80, 1.46]

aAdjusted for all variables shown in the table and for the length of follow-up time. Models are fit separately for each screening result category, where individuals identified at prior steps are excluded when fitting the model. Bolded figures represent statistically significant findings at an alpha of .05.