Table 1.
Comparison table for phantom test. CBCT = cone beam computer tomography.
Phantom Test | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Design | CBCT | RUS | Error (%) | |||||||||
Type/Class | d | D | DOS | d | D | DOS | d | D | DOS | Design and CBCT | CBCT and RUS | |
A | I | 9 | 10 | 19.0% | 8.8 | 9.8 | 20.6% | 8.7 | 9.8 | 21.2% | 1.6% | 0.6% |
II | 7.8 | 10 | 40.2% | 7.5 | 9.8 | 42.6% | 7.3 | 9.7 | 43.4% | 2.4% | 0.7% | |
III | 4.5 | 10 | 80.2% | 4.3 | 10 | 81.5% | 4.2 | 9.8 | 81.6% | 1.3% | 1.0% | |
B | I | 7 | 8 | 23.0% | 7 | 7.9 | 21.5% | 7.1 | 8.1 | 23.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% |
II | 6.2 | 8 | 40.0% | 6.2 | 7.9 | 38.4% | 6 | 7.8 | 40.8% | 1.6% | 2.4% | |
III | 3.5 | 8 | 80.9% | 3.3 | 7.8 | 82.2% | 3.1 | 7.9 | 84.6% | 1.3% | 2.4% | |
C | I | 4.5 | 5 | 19.0% | 4.2 | 4.8 | 23.4% | 3.9 | 4.5 | 24.9% | 4.4% | 1.5% |
II | 3.9 | 5 | 39.2% | 3.6 | 4.8 | 43.3% | 3.5 | 4.7 | 44.5% | 4.1% | 2.2% | |
III | 2.2 | 5 | 80.6% | 1.8 | 4.6 | 84.7% | 1.6 | 4.5 | 87.4% | 4.1% | 2.7% |
D unit is mm, d unit is mm, DOS means by Equation (1).