Table 2.
Sterilization Method | Effect on Bulk Parylene | Effect on Parylene-Parylene Adhesion | Effect on Parylene to Metal Adhesion | Effect on Parylene Adhesion to Other Materials | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electron beam ISO 11137 |
Chemical structure changed: partial breakage of C-Cl bonds, ionization of polymer, crystallinity decrease | No adverse effects recorded | No adverse effects recorded | n/a | [92,93] |
Gamma radiation ISO 11137 |
Recombination, cross-linking (increases strength and decreases elongation), loss in bond strength | n/a | Decreased adhesion, causing loss of electrical insulation capabilities | To silicon wafer: Crystallinity increased, no change in Young’s modulus |
[91,94] |
Ethylene oxide ISO 11135 |
Formation of inorganic chlorides, reduction of chlorine amount. EtO is toxic, carcinogenic, flammable, explosive | For sterilization after thermal annealing, no adverse effects recorded | Decreased electrical insulation capabilities (but not as damaging as gamma sterilization | To glass: No adverse effects recorded |
[93,95,96] |
Autoclave (steam) ISO 17665 |
Parylene became brittle and hard, decreased adhesion, changed chemical stability, did not contaminate | Decreased adhesion | Decreased adhesion | To silicon: Significant decrease in adhesion, Parylene crystallinity increased, electrical stability decreased |
[57,91,97,98,99] |
H2O2 Plasma ISO/NP 22441 * |
No change in adhesion. Recommended “best suitability for Parylene” (based on XRD testing), successfully killed bacteria without degradation of Parylene coating | n/a | n/a | To Silastic: Parylene withstood implantation and was unaffected. However, coating was easily peeled off after implantation, suggesting poor Parylene-Silastic adhesion |
[93,100,101] |
Antibiotic coating No standard |
0.5–0.75 mg/mL concentration of tetracycline nanoparticles completely eradicated E. coli but not aureus bacteria | n/a | n/a | n/a | [102] |
* NP: the standard is a new proposal and is still under consideration by the ISO.