Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;108(11):1543–1549. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304674

TABLE 1—

Characteristics of Study Participants and Gardens, Collected From a National Sample of School Gardeners: United States, June 2017

Characteristics No. (%)
Participants
Female 83 (83.8)
Primary gardener 62 (62.6)
Role
 Teacher 34 (34.3)
 Garden educator 14 (14.1)
 Administrator 17 (17.2)
 Parent or community volunteer 15 (15.2)
 FoodCorps member 5 (5.1)
 Other school personnela 14 (14.1)
Gardens
Location
 New York Stateb 58 (58.6)
 New York City 36 (33.3)
 Washington, DC 20 (20.2)
 California 3 (3.0)
 Iowa 3 (3.0)
 Wisconsin 3 (3.0)
 Colorado 2 (2.0)
 Washington 2 (2.0)
 Hawaii 1 (1.0)
 Kansas 1 (1.0)
 Minnesota 1 (1.0)
 Mississippi 1 (1.0)
 Maryland 1 (1.0)
 Massachusetts 1 (1.0)
 Connecticut 1 (1.0)
 New Jersey 1 (1.0)
Type of location
 Urban 70 (70.1)
 Suburban 15 (15.2)
 Rural 14 (14.1)
Length of operation, y
 < 1 14 (14.1)
 1 to < 3 37 (37.4)
 3 to < 5 20 (20.2)
 5 to < 10 16 (16.2)
 ≥ 10 12 (12.1)
Edible garden 92 (92.9)
Operating budget, $
 < 2000 67 (67.7)
 2000 to < 5000 17 (17.2)
 5000 to < 10 000 7 (7.1)
 10 000 to < 50 000 8 (8.1)
 ≥ 50 000 0 (0.0)
Primary gardener paid 35 (35.4)
Maintenance sourcesc
 Teacher 52 (52.5)
 Administrator 7 (7.1)
 Volunteer 21 (21.2)
 FoodCorps member 18 (18.2)
 Students 35 (35.4)
 Designated committee 17 (17.2)
 Other school personnela 13 (13.1)
 No maintenance 1 (1.0)

Note. A total of 99 school gardeners participated in the survey.

a

Personnel also employed at the school, other than teachers, garden educators, and administrators (including personnel from school food, farm school, sustainability groups, librarians, custodians, special education assistants, other, not specified).

b

Includes participants from New York City.

c

Respondents selected all sources of garden maintenance that applied; percentages do not total to 100.