Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;8(12):354. doi: 10.3390/mi8120354

Table 1.

Comparison of MEMS Rotational Electrostatic Actuators.

Reference Rotation Angle (°) Actuation Voltage (V) Area (mm2) Resonance Frequency (Hz) Notes
[19] ±9 60 1 × 1 410 Serpentine flexures used to increase the rotation angle at the expense of reduced operating speed.
[23] 4.7 75 1.5 × 0.6 N/A A real pivot formed by a double-clamped beam was utilized for the rotational tuning structures in MEMS tunable lasers.
[24] 2.8 100 ~2 × 0.5 N/A A movable arm 2 mm long forms the main rotating structure and can be reliably operated in the kilohertz range.
[25] ±1.5 190 ~2 × 1 ~1 k Actuators with movable arms of 1.2–1.5 mm with virtual pivotal point of rotation for external cavity tunable lasers.
[26] 3 130 2 × 1 246 Long-arm (>5 mm) comb-drive rotary actuator with an externally mounted large mirror for optical applications.
[27] ~±0.8 50 ~0.6 × 0.6 ~8–11.1 k MEMS switch based on a rotary electrostatic comb actuator.
[28] 2 100 ~2.5 × 2 10.268 k Microgripper based on a rotary comb actuator.
This work ±9.5 180 1.3 × 1 2.68 k Circular comb actuator with latch lock and gap-closing mechanisms for reconfigurable and low-loss in-plane integrated optics.