Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;14:2681–2688. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S169514

Table 3.

Analyses of mediation of the relationship between genotype and AUDIT total score

(a) rs755658
Mediator PAMS total score PAMS1
Effect SE 95% CI t P-value Effect SE 95% CI t P-value
Total effect 1.08 0.554 (−0.004; 2.17) 1.96 0.051 1.08 0.554 (−0.004; 2.17) 1.96 0.051
Direct effect 0.293 0.499 (−0.69; 1.27) 0.59 0.556 0.33 0.505 (−0.66; 1.03) 0.66 0.509
Effect SE Bootstrapped 95% CI Significance Effect SE Bootstrapped 95% CI Significance
Indirect effect 0.79 0.289 (0.272; 1.394) Significant 0.75 0.27 (0.24; 1.32) Significant
(b) rs1334894
Mediator PAMS total score PAMS1
Effect SE 95% CI t P-value Effect SE 95% CI t P-value
Total effect 1.17 0.55 (0.088; 2.25) 2.12 0.034 1.17 0.55 (0.088; 2.25) 2.12 0.034
Direct effect 0.376 0.496 (−0.6; 1.35) 0.75 0.449 0.42 0.503 (−0.57; 1.41) 0.83 0.405
Effect SE Bootstrapped 95% CI Significance Effect SE Bootstrapped 95% CI Significance
Indirect effect 0.79 0.28 (0.3; 1.38) Significant 0.75 0.26 (0.26; 1.29) Significant

Abbreviations: AUDIT, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; PAMS, Positive Alcohol Metacognitions Scale.