Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 20;44(Suppl 2):S547–S555. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby013

Table 1.

Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the CAINS in 185 People with Schizophrenia

χ2 df RMSEA NNFI CFI Model AIC
Unitary model 937.56 65 0.270 0.78 0.81 989.56
Two-factor model 1a (Chan et al23) 280.55 64 0.136 0.91 0.92 334.55
Two-factor model 1b (item 3 with item 4) 230.99 63 0.120 0.92 0.94 286.99
Two-factor model 2a (Kring et al19) 241.29 64 0.123 0.93 0.94 295.29
Two-factor model 2b (item 5 with item 6) 197.10 63 0.108 0.95 0.96 253.10
Two-factor model 2c (item 3 with item 4) 153.18 62 0.089 0.96 0.97 211.18
Two-factor model 2d (item 1 with item 5) 134.39 61 0.081 0.97 0.97 194.39
Two-factor model 2e (item 4 with item 6) 125.41 60 0.077 0.97 0.98 187.41
Two-factor model 2f (item 8 with item 9) 110.93 59 0.069 0.98 0.98 174.93
Two-factor model 2g (item 1 with item 7) 100.66 58 0.063 0.98 0.98 166.66
Two-factor model 2h (item 4 with item 9) 91.06 57 0.057 0.98 0.99 159.06
Two-factor model 2i (item 11 with item 12) 85.02 56 0.053 0.99 0.99 155.02

Note: RMSEA, root mean squared error of approximation; NNFI, nonnormed fit index; CFI, comparative fix index; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion.