Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 1;2018:3050278. doi: 10.1155/2018/3050278

Table 2.

Physicians' knowledge and attitude toward t-PA.

Questions Response Frequency Percentage
How would you rate your knowledge about t-PA use in ischemic stroke? Well updated about most recent literature and guidelines 65 53.2
General knowledge but acceptable 50 40.9
Poor knowledge 7 5.7

Do you think t-PA is an effective treatment for stroke within 4.5 hours of onset? Yes 70 57.4
No 35 28.7
I don't know 17 13.9

Do you consider t-PA a standard of care for ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours from onset in eligible patient? Yes 57 46.7
No 50 41.0
I don't know 15 12.3

How would you grade the level of evidence for the use t-PA in ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset? Strong (high level) 35 28.7
Weak (low level) 19 15.6
Controversial 56 45.9
I don't know 12 9.8

Do you recommend t-PA in acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset for eligible patients? Yes 66 54.1
No 50 41
Uncertain 6 4.9

If you don't recommend t-PA use in stroke, what would be the main reason? (n=56) Risk of hemorrhage 17 30.3
lack of benefit 21 37.5
Medico-legal liability 4 7.1
Lack of stroke expertise 14 25.0

In the absence of stroke expertise, what do you recommend? No t-PA should be offered 42 34.4
Train emergency physicians to give t-PA. 43 35.2
Train internists to give t-PA 7 5.7
Establish telestroke. 30 24.6

When needed, would you be willing to be enrolled in training to administer t-PA for stroke (similar to t-PA for myocardial infarction)? Yes 63 51.6
No 39 32.0
Uncertain 20 16.4

If telestroke is implemented, would you be willing to administer IV t-PA for ischemic stroke in collaboration with remote stroke neurology consultation? Yes 64 52.5
No 31 25.4
Uncertain 27 22.1