Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205337

Table 1. Overview of relevant design features of existing research on the prognostic value of psychological factors.

Participants Measurement Methods Design and Statistical Analysis
Gender female Diagnostic type of instrument Sample size N < 100
  male Criterion variable* (Selection level T2) PRO   100 ≤ N ≤ 200
Continent Europe NT or YA   N > 200
  Australia   SCHO Prognostic period < 1 year
Development stage <U12   CR   1–3 years
  U12-U15   NEXT   > 3 years
  U16-U19     Dimension of domains unidimensional
Performance level T1 youth academy     multidimensional
  talent development program     Procedures univariate
regional clubs     multivariate
          person-oriented

Note.

*Criterion variable at the time of subsequent measurement, assessing whether individuals turned professional (PRO), joined a youth national team or a youth academy (NT or YA), received a scholarship for an elite program (SCHO), performance was rated by their coaches (CR) or simply reached next age class at the competitive playing level (NEXT).