Table 3. Overview about studies investigated perceptual-cognitive factors and their empirical evidence.

Objective 1										Objective 2
	Participants			Measurement Methods			Design and Statistical Analysis			Empirical Evidence
Study	Size (N)	Development stage	Performance level T1	Investigated predictor variable	Diagnostic	Criterion variable (Selection level T2)	Prognostic period	Dimension of domains	Procedures	Significant predictor variable	Significant effect sizes between groups (reconstructed if not given)
Forsman et al. (2016)	114	U16-U19	youth academies Finland	positioning and deciding, knowing about ball actions, knowing about others, acting in changing situations	TACSIS	professional (elite vs. sub-elite)	4 years	multidimensional	logistic regression, t-test	acting in changing situations	d = 0.50*
Huijgen et al. (2014)	113	U16-U19	youth academy Netherlands	positioning and deciding, knowing about ball actions, knowing about others, acting in changing situations	TACSIS	continue playing level (selected vs. deselected)	< 1 year	multidimensional	MANCOVA, Post-hoc; Discriminant analysis	positioning and deciding	d = 0.63*
Kannekens et al. (2011)	105	U16-U19	youth academy Netherlands	positioning and deciding, knowing about ball actions, knowing about others, acting in changing situations	TACSIS	professional (professional vs. amateur)	3–5 years	unidimensional	Logistic regression	positioning and deciding	d = 0.43*
O'Connor et al. (2016)	127	U12-U15	talent development programme Australia	decision-making, anticipation, situational probability, pattern recognition	video-based assessment	scholarship for an elite player residential programme (selected vs. deselected)	< 1 year	unidimensional	ANOVA Chi-Square analysis Stepwise discriminant analysis	decision-making	d = 0.81*

Note.

*p < 0.05.