Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205337

Table 4. Overview about studies investigated personality-related factors and their empirical evidence.

Objective I Objective 2
  Subjects Measurement Methods Design and Statistical Analysis Empirical Evidence
Study Size (N) Development stage Performance level T1 Investigated predictor variable Diagnostic Criterion variable (Selection level T2) Prognostic period Dimension of domains Procedures Significant predictor variable Significant effect sizes (reconstructed if not given) between groups
Figueiredo et al. (2009) 159 U12-U15 regional clubs Portugal Goal Orientation TEOSQ continue playing level (elite vs. club and drop-out) 2 years multidimensional MANOVA, ANOVA, post-hoc none n.s.
Forsman et al. (2016) 114 U16-U19 youth academies Finland Mental Skills PSIS professional (elite vs. sub-elite) 4 years multidimensional logistic regression, t-test Motivational skills d = 0.79*
Höner & Feichtinger (2016) 1701 / 1804 U12-U15 talent development program Germany Achievement Motive, Sport Orientation, Task and Ego Orientation, Volitional Components, Physical Self-Concept, Self-Efficacy, Competition Anxiety AMS; TEOSQ; SOQ; VCS; PSC; SES; CAI-T drafted for youth academies (YA vs. NS) 4 years unidimensional Logistic regression analysis, ANOVA, Tukey test Hope for success, fear of failure, completion orientation, goal orientation, task orientation, self-estimation, general self-concept, specific self-concept, self-efficacy, worry d = 0.27*, d = 0.21*, d = 0.26*, d = 0.20*, d = 0.20*, d = 0.23*, d = 0.22*, d = 0.30, d = 0.19*, d = 0.20*
Huijgen et al. (2014) 113 U16-U19 youth academy Netherlands Goal Orientation, Mental Skills TEOSQ, PSIS continue playing level (selected vs. deselected) < 1 year multidimensional MANCOVA, Post-hoc; Discriminant analysis none n.s
Van Yperen (2009) 65 U16-U19 youth academy Netherlands Goal Commitment, Coping, Seeking Social Support  Van Yperen Scale professional (successful vs. unsuccessful) 15 years unidimensional ANCOVAs; Discriminant analysis Goal Commitment, Coping, Seeking Social Support d = 0.86*, d = 0.6*
Zuber et al. (2016) 119 U12-U15 talent development program Swiss Achievement Motive AMS drafted for youth national team or regional clubs (NT vs. RC and NS) 1 year multidimensional LICUR analysis none n.s.
Zuber et al. (2015) 92 U12-U15 talent development program Swiss Achievement Motive, Orientation, Self-Determination AMS, SOQ drafted for youth national teams (NT vs. NS) 1 year unidimensional LICUR analysis Hope for success, self-determination d = 0.74*, d = 0.81*
Zuber & Conzelmann (2014) 140 U12-U15 talent development program Swiss Achievement Motive AMS coaches rated the performance of their players (fictions NT vs. NS) < 1 year unidimensional Structural equation models Hope for success r = 0.27*

Note. Criterion variable: Youth national team (NT); Regional club (RC); Youth academy (YA); Non-selected (NS)

*p < 0.05

†There are a few players who are under the age of 16