Abstract
An intelligent drug release system that is triggered into action upon sensing the motion of swarmer P. mirabilis is introduced. The rational design of the drug release system focuses on a pNIPAAm-co-pAEMA copolymer that prevents drug leakage in a tobramycin-loaded mesoporous silica particle by covering its surface via electrostatic attraction. The copolymer chains are also conjugated to peptide ligands YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 that display affinity to Gram-negative bacteria. When swarmer P. mirabilis cells approach and come in contact with the particle, the copolymer-YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 binds to the lipopolysaccharides on the outer membrane of motile P. mirabilis and are stripped off the particle surface when the cells move away; hence releasing tobramycin into the swarmer colony and inhibiting its expansion. The release mechanism is termed Motion-Induced Mechanical Stripping (MIMS). For swarmer B. subtilis, the removal of copolymers from particle surfaces via MIMS is not apparent due to poor adherence between bacteria and copolymer-YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 system.
Urinary tract infections are a common side effect of urethral catheters. Here, the authors report on the development of antibiotic loaded NPs with functional polymer coatings which attach too and are removed by motile bacteria to trigger the release of antibiotic.
Introduction
Proteus mirabilis is a Gram-negative bacteria associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) that often affect patients inserted with indwelling urethral catheters1–4. A unique characteristics of P. mirabilis is its ability to undergo cell differentiation into elongated and hyperflagellated swarmer cells that move rapidly across surfaces of solid media, including urethral catheter surfaces, in multicellular rafts1–5. The collective motion is believed to play a role in the initiation of catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) by facilitating the dissemination of bacteria from infection sites on the catheter to the bladder3,4,6,7. The most common treatment of CAUTIs involves either regular replacements of infected catheters with new ones, administration of strong antibiotics or prevention of biofilm formation/encrustation, often with conflicting results3,4,8. Unfortunately, existing methods to combat CAUTIs are unable to control the release of antibiotics nor do they specifically target the initial migration of swarmer P. mirabilis from catheter surface to urinary tract.
The controlled release of drug is an important process as it allows the therapeutic agent to display its active form only at the infection site9–11. Previous technologies on 'on-demand' release of antimicrobial drugs encapsulated within carriers (e.g., particles, polymers, etc.) have utilized toxin/lipase secreted by bacteria to react with toxin/lipase-responsive materials on carriers to trigger drug release11–15. Another common stimuli-responsive method utilizes the reduced pH environment in cariogenic dental biofilms (pH ≤ 4.5) to activate drug release from pH-sensitive carriers16,17. So far, there have been no reports on controlled drug release technology based on the motion of motile bacteria.
In this communication, as proof-of-concept, we will design and prepare an intelligent drug release system (I-DRS) that releases antimicrobial agents in the presence of motion of swarming P. mirabilis, and demonstrate the I-DRS efficacy against the spread of the swarmer colony. The I-DRS comprises of a mesoporous silica particle MCM-41 that contains an antimicrobial drug (Fig. 1). In the absence of motile bacteria, the therapeutic payload is retained within the pores and prevented from leaking out via a polymeric shell, electrostatically bound to the particle surface, that blocks the pore entrances. The polymer used is a pNIPAAm-co-pAEMA copolymer, consisting of the monomers N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) and 2-aminoethyl methacrylate hydrochloride (AEMA), conjugated to peptide ligands with sequence YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 that bind to lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (3 in Fig. 2). In this way, when swarmer P. mirabilis cells approach close to the I-DRS, polymeric chains initially found on the surface of the particle will attach themselves onto the fast moving cells because of the LPS-copolymer 3 binding and be pulled away (i.e., mechanically stripped off the particle due to the strong force from rapidly moving bacteria); hence allowing the encapsulated drug to be released into the bacterial colony (Fig. 1). We term this bacteria-triggered drug release mechanism as Motion-Induced Mechanical Stripping (MIMS).
Results and Discussion
Copolymer 3 seals in payloads
The copolymer pNIPAAm-co-pAEMA is used because it is non-toxic to P. mirabilis at the concentrations used here, soluble in water and covenient to synthesize and funtionalize. In particular, pNIPAAm-based copolymers and pAEMA have previously been utilized for drug delivery to various cells with little cytotoxicity effects18–21. The peptide YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 binds relatively strongly to LPS, found on the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, with an association constant of Ka = 0.130 μM−1 (Supplementary Fig. 1)22–24. The binding of the peptide to LPS is comparable to the association between a YVLWKRKRFIFI peptide, a sequence close to the one used in this study, and LPS (Ka = 0.22 μM−1)22, and between other LPS binding peptides and LPS (~0.1–0.2 μM−1)25,26.
Copolymer 3 was prepared by atom-transfer radical polymerization of NIPAAm and AEMA with ethyl-2-bromopropionate as initiator and CuBr as catalyst to yield copolymer 1 with Mn = 10171 g mol−1 and Mw = 21985 g mol−1 (Fig. 2)27. A fraction of the amine groups in 1 (~20%) were converted to maleimides by reacting with 3-maleimidopropionic acid to give copolymer 2. Peptide ligands YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 were subsequently attached to 2 via a stable carbon (maleimide)-sulfur (cysteine) bond to obtain the desired copolymer 3 with Mn = 14,212 g mol−1 and Mw = 43,033 g mol−1 (Fig. 2). The average number of NIPAAm, AEMA and peptide units per chain is m ~ 77, n ~ 11 and p ~ 2, respectively. Copolymer 3 is positively charged with a zeta potential ζpolymer = 21.8 ± 1.3 mV (s.d., three independent experiments) due to the presence of the remaining amine groups. The lower critical solution temperature LCST of copolymer 3 is determined to be 53 oC (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 1) which is significantly higher than the temperature used in the experiments reported here (≤37 oC). The mesoporous silica particles (average diameter = 264 ± 60 nm), with an average mesopore diameter of 3.5 nm, were prepared using standard procedures (Supplementary Fig. 3)28.
In order to show that copolymer 3 is able to seal in payloads, toluidine blue (TB) was first loaded into mesoporous silica particles, and the copolymer was electrostatically bound to the negatively charged particle surface (i.e., measured zeta-potential of MCM-41 ζMCM-41 = −41.0 ± 0.9 mV (three independent experiments)) to form a copolymer shell. TB is a positively charged dye that can be readily quantified using spectroscopic methods such as UV–vis absorbance. The strong absorbance of TB at visible wavelengths makes it a convenient indicator to quickly assess the loading ability of the dye into polymer-coated silica particles. The dye-loaded particles were dialyzed for 4 days before treatment with 1 M HCl (5 min) to remove copolymer 3 chains from particle surface. A similar experiment was also conducted on dye-loaded silica particles but without an initial copolymer shell. For the latter, the absorption spectrum of TB released during the HCl treatment has low absorbance intensity (Fig. 3a); indicating that most of the dye was released after 4 days of dialysis and only a small amount retained within the particles. On the other hand, for dye-loaded particles with an initial copolymer shell, a significant amount of TB was released upon detachment of copolymer chains from the particle surface during the HCl treatment (Fig. 3a). In particular, for the 635 nm absorption peak, the absorbance of TB released from particles with an initial copolymer shell is ~18 times larger than that in the absence of an initial shell. This clearly suggests that during the dialysis period, copolymer 3 is able to prevent leakages of TB stored within the pores of the silica particles. We therefore propose that copolymer 3 is effective for sealing in active compounds loaded into mesoporous silica particles.
In this study, the drug used is tobramycin which is an antibiotic known to be active against P. mirabilis29,30. From UV–vis absorption spectroscopy, the release curve of tobramycin from silica particles without a copolymer shell after the drug has been loaded into the particles is given in Fig. 3b. By fitting the release curve to a double-exponential rise function, the maximum amount of tobramycin released from the particles is estimated to be ~0.2 mg of drug per mg of particles which is comparable to the loaded amount of Tob in mesoporous silica particles (i.e., 0.234 mg of drug per mg of particles). We note that the antibiotic released from silica particles follows a two-step process; a fast release within the first 2 h followed by a slower release. According to the Higuchi model31, the linear relationship observed between the amounts of drug released after time t (Q) vs. t½ in both steps (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 2) suggests a diffusion controlled kinetics for the release of tobramycin. In the case of copolymer 3-coated silica particles containing the drug, no detectable amount of tobramycin was released after dialysis (4 days); indicating that copolymer 3 prevented leakages of tobramycin from the particles.
MIMS in aqueous solution
MIMS is first demonstrated in water using an LPS-coated polystyrene (PS) bead. In this case, PS latex beads (~1 μm mean particle size) were first treated with LPS to allow the adsorption of LPS onto the surface of the beads. When an aqueous mixture of drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles (10 mg) and free LPS (2 mg mL−1) was stirred at 100 rpm for 2 h, no released drug was detected via HPLC. On the other hand, when a mixture of drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles and LPS-coated PS beads (10 mg) was stirred at 100 rpm to enable the two entities to come into contact with each other, tobramycin was released and the drug release kinetics is given in Supplementary Fig. 5. We note that ca. 0.15 mg of drug per mg of particles was released after stirring with LPS-coated PS latex beads which is in agreement with the amount of drug released from silica particles without an initial copolymer shell (Fig. 3b). It is also observed that in the absence of stirring, no released drug was detected in still water.
We propose that LPS on PS beads binds to copolymer 3 on silica particles when the two entities are in close contact. The copolymer is subsequently pulled off the surface of silica particles when the particles and PS beads are forced apart during stirring. The release of tobramycin occurs at a faster rate (>80% of steady-state amount released within 2 h) compared to the release of drug in Fig. 3b possibly due to more collisions occurring between the exposed silica particles and PS beads. Free LPS by itself is unable to cause detachment of copolymer 3 from silica particles due to insufficient stripping energy. When a mixture of amine-modified PS beads (~1 μm, 10 mg) that are not coated with LPS and drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles was stirred at 100 rpm, no significant amount of released drug was detected even after 2 h; suggesting that in the absence of LPS on PS beads, MIMS is not in operation. Furthermore, collision between PS beads and silica particles alone does not lead to the detachment of copolymer chains from the latter.
MIMS on agar surface
The efficacy of the I-DRS against the expansion of swarmer P. mirabilis is studied next. Drug-free copolymer 3-coated silica particles (Fig. 4a) and copolymer 3-coated particles containing tobramycin (Fig. 4b, c) were separately deposited on the left side of the (1%) agar surface. The cells were subsequently inoculated on the right side of the agar and cultured for 20 h at 37 °C. An expanding swarmer colony was achieved after a lag time of ~8 h. When 0.8 mg of drug-free copolymer 3-coated silica particles were used, the swarmer cells colonized the entire agar surface (Fig. 4a). This suggests that in the absence of drug, the I-DRS is non-toxic when the amount used is as high as 0.8 mg.
When copolymer 3-coated silica particles loaded with tobramycin (ca. 0.2 mg of drug per mg of particles) were used, the swarmer colony spread throughout the particle-free surface (i.e., right side) of the agar (Fig. 4b, c). However, an impediment to the expansion of the colony across the surface of the agar containing the I- DRS (i.e., left side) was observed. In addition, the swarmer colony was found to possess a secondary front (thin layer) that preceded a primary front (thick layer). Two parameters are employed to characterize the I-DRS efficacy: Ls and Lp are the distances from the center of the vertical line dividing the particle (left side) and particle-free (right side) zones to the intersection points between the horizontal bisector and the secondary and primary fronts, respectively. When 0.2 (Fig. 4b) and 0.05 (Fig. 4c) mg of silica particles were used, the secondary fronts of both colonies expanded only slightly into the particle zone with Ls = 3.9 and 13.5 mm, respectively. On the other hand, both the primary fronts were not able to cross into the particle zone; Lp = 7.1 and 2.3 mm for 0.2 and 0.05 mg of particles, respectively. Therefore, when swarmer cells from the secondary front enter into the particle zone and come in contact with the particles, drug is released. Bacteria in the secondary front are subsequently damaged and the colony is not able to continue its expansion. In the presence of a larger amount of particles, more tobramycin is released into the colony resulting in a greater impediment to colony expansion (i.e., shorter Ls and longer Lp for 0.2 mg particles compared to 0.05 mg particles). It is worth mentioning that tobramycin released from the silica particles deposited on the left side of the agar penetrates through agar, however, a concentration gradient is expected such that the amount of free tobramycin that has diffused away to the right-side of the agar is likely to be lower than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against P. mirabilis (~2 μg mL−1) (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Note 3), and does not cause inhibition of the proliferation of cells on that side of the agar.
A control experiment was also performed to examine the effects of immobile cells on the I-DRS. In this case, P. mirabilis cells were inoculated on the entire surface of a hard (4%) agar containing, on the left side surface, 0.2 mg of copolymer 3-coated silica particles loaded with tobramycin (ca. 0.2 mg of drug per mg of particles). After the cells were dried and cultured for 20 h (at 37 °C), it was seen that P. mirabilis proliferated into a thick layer of immobile (vegetative) cells throughout the agar with no obvious inhibition of cell growth at the side of the surface containing the particles (Fig. 4d). When a similar experiment was performed using drug-loaded silica particles without a copolymer shell, the leakage of tobramycin into the surroundings prevented the proliferation of bacteria in the particle-zone (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Note 4). Since differences in agar concentration do not significantly affect the inhibition zones and antibiotic gradient32, the absence of bacterial inhibition zones in Fig. 4d indicates that tobramycin is not released by immobile bacteria and this is in agreement with our earlier findings that when copolymer chains are not stripped off the particle surface, minimal leakage of payload occurs (see Fig. 3a).
Despite the antimicrobial effects of YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 against P. mirabilis (MIC = 1.6 mg mL−1, Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Note 5), Fig. 4a shows that the peptide from the I-DRS does not cause obvious damage to the swarmer colony; probably because of its low concentration (<MIC). Furthermore, using an E-test assay, it is demonstrated that the MIC of tobramycin against vegetative P. mirabilis (~2.0 μg mL−1) remained unchanged in the presence of a comparable amount of copolymer 3 as utilized in Fig. 4b (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Note 3). Therefore, the bacteria do not become more susceptible nor the activity of the antibiotic enhanced in the presence of the copolymer used.
Copolymer 3 adheres stronger to LPS than to silica
AFM force spectroscopy experiments were conducted to determine the adhesion forces between copolymer 3 and SiO2 and LPS. It is observed that the interaction between a bare SiO2 spherical tip and a layer of LPS attached on the surface of a Si wafer is negligible (see Supplementary Fig. 9 for a representative force curve and Supplementary Note 6). On the other hand, significant interaction between the bare SiO2 tip and a layer of copolymer 3 on a Si wafer is observed, where a representative force curve in Fig. 5a yields an adhesion force of 1.26 nN. A histogram of the adhesion force between the bare SiO2 tip and copolymer 3, based on 100 force curves (inset of Fig. 5a), shows that the adhesion force ranges from 0.78 to 2.94 nN.
In a separate experiment, a SiO2 spherical tip functionalized with a shell of copolymer 3 was used to determine the adhesion force between the copolymer and LPS. We observed a relatively large adhesion force between the modified SiO2 tip and LPS as illustrated by three representative force curves collected before 90 ramp cycles in Fig. 5b. The adhesion peaks are broad due to the stretching of outer copolymer upon interaction with LPS on the Si wafer. A histogram of adhesion force, based on 90 force curves, indicates that the adhesion force between copolymer 3 and LPS ranges between 3.26 and 26.92 nN (inset of Fig. 5b). For the 90 to 432 ramp cycles, the adhesion peaks for LPS become narrower and a much smaller force is seen (e.g., 1.7 to 3.5 nN for three representative curves in Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Note 6). After 432 ramp cycles, no adhesion peak is observed (Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Note 6). This is likely due to the peeling off of copolymer 3 from the contact surface of the SiO2 tip as a result of the stronger adhesion force between the copolymer and LPS. We, therefore, propose that copolymer 3, initially adsorbed on the surface of silica particles, will adhere more strongly to swarmer P. mirabilis in the secondary front when the latter comes into contact with the silica particles. The kinetic energy from the motile bacteria is able to strip the copolymer off the surface of the silica particles (i.e., MIMS is in operation) as demonstrated experimentally in the wide-field fluorescence microscopy (WFFM) measurements below.
Real-time monitoring of MIMS using WFFM
In the WFFM study, copolymer 3, labelled with a photostable Atto 647N chromophore (ATTO-TEC GmbH), is electrostatically bound to drug-free particles. Supplementary Movie 1 shows a typical swarmer P. mirabilis colony expanding from left to right on an (1%) agar containing copolymer 3-coated silica particles. Copolymer 3 chains were detached from silica particles found inside the swarmer colony (i.e., white fluorescent streaks flowing away from particles and swirling inside the colony) and not from particles located outside the colony. An example is given in Fig. 6 for the particle at (x = 50 μm, y = 83 μm). An overlay of the images of the swarmer colony and labeled copolymer at time t = 0.59 s is seen in Fig. 6a where the colony front is in contact with the particle. As the colony continues to expand, copolymer 3 is stripped off the particle surface by the swarmer cells (i.e., at t = 3.92 s where only the silica particle is imaged with no image interference from the colony (Fig. 6b) and at t = 4.48 s where images of both the colony and particle are recorded (Fig. 6c)). As time progresses, more copolymer chains are removed and swirls of fluorescent white streaks arising from the transportation of removed copolymers by the motile cells are visible (Fig. 6d). When the cells are immotile (Fig. 4d), MIMS is not in operation which prevents both the release of drug and inhibition of cell proliferation.
Swarmer B. subtilis colony
The MIC value of tobramycin against vegetative Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis is ~1.5 μg mL−1 (Supplementary Fig. 11 and Supplementary Note 7) which is slightly lower than the MIC against P. mirabilis. An experiment similar to Fig. 4c was therefore conducted on swarmer B. subtilis to compare its effects on the I-DRS. In this case, the colony is capable of expanding fully into the left side of an (0.5%) agar containing 0.05 mg of drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles on the agar surface (Supplementary Fig. 11 and Supplementary Note 7); suggesting that no lethal amounts of drug are released from the particles despite the presence of motile B. subtilis.
Weaker binding is observed between the peptide YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) found on the cell walls of B. subtilis (Ka = 0.042 μM−1, Supplementary Fig. 12). In addition, a surface charge neutralization by zeta potential study was performed. In the absence of copolymer 3, P. mirabilis exhibits a larger negative potential (~−20 mV) as compared to B. subtilis (~−4 mV). As shown in Fig. 7, the addition of ca. 1–2 μM of copolymer 3 neutralizes the negative charge of the bacterial cell wall. A larger over compensation of surface charges is seen for P. mirabilis (e.g., zeta potentials of +7 mV and +2 mV for P. mirabilis and B. subtilis, respectively, are obtained when the concentration of copolymer 3 added is 8 μM). This means that for a given concentration of copolymer 3 added, the number of copolymer 3 bound to P. mirabilis is significantly higher than that for B. subtilis.
The AFM force curves for interactions between bare SiO2 spherical tip and LTA, and between LTA and copolymer 3 adsorbed on a SiO2 spherical tip do not display adhesion peaks (Supplementary Figure 9 and Supplementary Note 6); suggesting that the adhesion force between copolymer 3 and LTA is too weak to be measured by AFM. We, therefore, propose that when swarmer B. subtilis come into contact with the copolymer on silica particles, the copolymer remains attached onto the particles. Since the copolymer is not adhered to motile B. subtilis, the motile cells are unable to strip the copolymer off the silica particle surface. This mechanism is in line with the WFFM study that shows a distinct absence of bright streaks moving away from drug-free silica particles coated with dye-labelled copolymer 3 within a swarmer B. subtilis colony (Supplementary Movie 2 for multi-layer colony and 3 for single-layer colony)33,34. This demonstrates two points: (i) collision by fast moving bacteria is not sufficient to cause the electrostatically bound copolymers to be detached from the silica particle surface, and (ii) MIMS is not in operation here.
In summary, the I-DRS proposed in this study releases therapeutic drugs upon sensing the presence of swarmer P. mirabilis and is able to effectively impede the spread of the colony. An important feature of the I-DRS is its affinity to P. mirabilis due to the relatively strong binding between the conjugated copolymer-(YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2) system with the Gram-negative bacteria. Further studies are underway to realize the applications of MIMS in biomedicine where the short and long term toxicological effects of the I-DRS in humans are noted35,36.
Methods
Chemicals and instruments
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, AEMA, β-alanine, NIPAAm, ethyl-2-bromopropionate, maleic anhydride, N,N,N’,N’,N’-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA), tobramycin, TB, CuBr, tetraethoxysilane, lipoteichoic acid (LTA from B. subtilis, protein content ≤ 3%), lipopolysaccharide (LPS from P. mirabilis, protein content ≤ 3%, and P. aeruginosa), PS latex beads and amine-modified PS beads were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. ATTO-647N-NHS ester was purchased from ATTO-TEC GmbH. Twenty-five percent ammonia was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. o-Benzotriazol-1-yl-N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU) and amino acids used for solid phase peptide synthesis were purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. NIPAAm was recrystalized using hexane before use. Dicarboxy terminated poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) (P9110E-NIPAM2COOH, Mn: 10,000) was purchased from polymer source. All other chemicals were used as received. Tobramycin E-test strips were obtained from bioMérieux.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of silica particles were recorded using JEM 1400 (JEOL). Mass spectra were measured using a LCQ Fleet mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was carried out on an Ultrashield 400 Plus NMR spectrometer (Bruker). Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data was obtained using a 1260 Infinity II (Agilent Technologies) GPC instrument with PolarGelM column (Agilent Technologies). UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy was measured using a Cary-100 UV–Vis spectrometer (Varian). Zeta potential was measured using a Zetasizer NANO system (Malvern). High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Waters 2695 Separations Module) was used to quantify the amounts of tobramycin released from copolymer 3-coated silica particles.
Synthesis of mesoporous silica MCM-41 particles
In a 250 mL flask, a mixture of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (0.35 g) and 25% ammonia (40 mL) were added into water (70 mL) and stirred at 80 oC for 30 min28. Tetraethoxysilane (1.70 g) was then slowly added to the mixture and stirred at 80 °C for 2 h. The white precipitate was filtered and washed with water (four times) and ethanol (four times). The mesoporous silica particle MCM-41 product was dried overnight at 80 °C and calcinated at 600 oC for 6 h at a heating rate of 1 °C min−1.
Synthesis of bacterial recognizing peptide
The peptide sequence YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 was synthesized using solid phase synthesis method24. MS (TOF) found: 1786.99; calculated: 1787.03 for C88H136N23O15S [YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2+H]+.
Synthesis of 3-maleimidopropionic acid 4
In a 250 mL flask, β-alanine (0.89 g) and maleic anhydride (0.98 g) were mixed in dry THF (150 mL) and stirred for 2 days. The solvent was evaporated and toluene (100 mL) was used to suspend the white precipitate. The suspension was then stirred at 120 °C for 6 h and cooled to room temperature. Toluene was then removed by evaporation to leave a yellow precipitate. The product 3-maleimidopropionic acid 4 was first extracted from the yellow precipitate using DCM. The DCM solution was washed with NaHCO3 solution (three times) followed by water and brine. The organic phase was dried by Na2SO4 and evaporated to get the crude product which was purified using flash column with DCM. See Supplementary Fig. 13. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ(ppm) 6.72(s, 2H), 3.84 (t, 2H), 2.71 (t, 2H). 13C NMR(CDCl3): δ(ppm) 176.2, 170.3, 134.3, 33.3, 32.5.
Synthesis of copolymer 1
A mixture of NIPAAm (1.98 g, NIPAAm), 2-aminoethyl methacrylate hydrochloride (0.41 g, AEMA), ethyl-2-bromopropionate (0.018 g), N,N,N’,N’,N’- pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (45 μL, PMDETA), methanol (16 mL) and water (24 mL) in a 100 mL schlenk flask was degassed by cycles of freeze-pump-thaw27. CuBr (0.015 g) was added while the mixture was frozen. The solution was then stirred under argon atmosphere at room temperature for overnight. The product was purified by dialysis and dried to obtain pNIPAAm-co-pAEMA copolymer 1. See Supplementary Fig. 14. The number average molecular weight Mn = 10171 g mol−1, weight average molecular weight Mw = 21,985 g mol−1 and polydispersity PD = 2.16.
Synthesis of copolymer 2
O-Benzotriazol-1-yl-N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (0.02 g, HBTU) and 3-maleimidopropionic acid 4 (0.085 g) were dissolved in dry DMF (5 mL) and stirred for 10 min before being added to a solution containing copolymer 1 (0.24 g) in dry DMF (10 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 days at room temperature. DMF was then evaporated and the crude product was dissolved in water and purified by dialysis. The solution was lyophilized to obtain dry copolymer 2. See Supplementary Fig. 15.
Synthesis of copolymer 3
Peptide YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 (100 mg) was dissolved in PBS buffer (100 mL) and filtered using a 25 mm syringe filter with 0.45 μm membrane. Copolymer 2 (0.2 g) was then added into the filtered solution. The mixture was stirred for 3 days at room temperature and purified by dialysis. The final solution was lyophilized to yield copolymer 3. See Supplementary Fig. 16. The number average molecular weight Mn = 14,212 g mol−1, weight average molecular weight Mw = 43,033 g mol−1 and polydispersity PD = 3.63. Assuming a stoichiometric reaction, the ratio m:n = 7.06:1. This agrees with the 1H NMR data of copolymer 3 in D2O where peaks at δ(3.90 ppm) from Ha and δ(4.25-4.10 ppm) from Hb and Hc have an integration area ratio = 5.74:1. The values of m, n, and p were therefore taken to be ca. 77, 11 and 2, respectively.
Fluorescent dye labeling of copolymer
Copolymer 2 (200 mg) was dissolved in 0.1 M NaHCO3 solution (15 mL). ATTO-647N-NHS ester (1 mg) was added into the solution and stirred for 2 days at room temperature. The mixture was then dialyzed and lyophilized to get copolymer 5. A similar procedure as outlined above was performed on copolymer 5 to yield the dye-labelled copolymer 6 (Supplementary Fig. 17). On average, one dye molecule was conjugated to a copolymer chain.
LCST of copolymer 3
Transmittance at 450 nm of copolymer 3 dissolved in PBS buffer (~0.33 g per mL) with different pH values (2.7, 5.8, and 7.2) was measured at different temperatures using a Cary-300 UV–Vis spectrometer (Varian) equipped with a dual cell peltier accessory. The lower critical solution temperature LCST is the temperature at 50% light transmittance at 450 nm of the original polymer solution. The LCST of commercial PNIPAAm (α,ω-bis(carboxy)-terminated) was also measured as a control.
Determining the loaded amount of drug
A weighed amount of silica particles (~5 mg) were loaded with tobramycin by stirring an aqueous solution (~500 μL) of tobramycin (400 mg mL−1) with the particles for 3 days. The drug-loaded particles were recovered by centrifugation (10,956 × g), washed with DI water (0.5 mL), freeze dried and weighed again. The loading amount was obtained by the difference in mass of silica particles before and after loading with tobramycin. For our experiment, the amount of tobramycin loaded is 0.234 0.006 mg of drug per 1 mg of silica particles (average of two independent experiments).
E-test assay
For P. mirabilis: An (4%) agar plate was prepared in a 10-cm Petri dish. An exponential-growth phase P. mirabilis culture was applied on the entire agar surface and dried for 15 min. A tobramycin E-test strip was placed on the center of the surface of the agar before incubation for 20 h at 37 °C.
To examine if copolymer 3 affects the viability of P. mirabilis when exposed to tobramycin, 1.4 mg mL−1 copolymer 3 (200 μL) was evenly applied on the entire surface of an (4%) agar and dried for 30 min. An exponential-growth phase P. mirabilis culture was then applied on the entire agar surface and dried for 15 min. A tobramycin E-test strip was placed on the center of the agar followed by an incubation period of 20 h at 37 oC. The MIC value was recorded following manufacturer instructions.
For B. subtilis: An (4 %) agar plate was prepared in a 10-cm Petri dish. An exponential-growth phase B. subtilis culture was applied on the entire agar surface and dried for 15 min. A tobramycin E-test strip was placed on the center of the surface of the agar before incubation for 20 h at 37 °C. The MIC value was recorded following manufacturer instructions.
MIC of YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 against P.mirabilis
The MIC of the peptide YVLWKRKRKFCFI-NH2 against P. mirabilis was determined. Mid logarithmic phase of an overnight culture in LB broth was prepared and OD600 adjusted to 0.2. The bacterial medium (50 μL) was added to an equal volume (50 μL) of an aqueous solution of peptide of various concentrations (i.e., 0, 64, 128, 256, 320, 640, 1280, 1600, 1920, and 3200 μg mL−1), The mixture was incubated for 3 h at 37 °C, and a 100 times-diluted solution (10 μL) was applied onto an LB-agar plate. The minimum concentration of peptide that results in 90% growth inhibition is taken to be the MIC value.
Isothermal titration calorimetry
The binding constants between peptide YVLWKRKRKFC-NH2 and LPS and between the peptide with LTA were determined using a MicroCal iTC200 isothermal titration calorimeter. Peptide, LPS (from P. mirabilis) and LTA (from B. subtilis) solutions were first prepared by dissolving each component in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). LTA (50 μM) was loaded into the sample cell, the reference cell was filled with the same buffer and the syringe was filled with 1 mM peptide solution. Typically, 25 injections of 1.6 μL of peptide were made into the sample cell at 25 °C and the sample cell was stirred at 900 rpm. Raw data were obtained and analyzed using single set of binding sites in the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software. Association constant (Ka) was directly determined from the ITC profiles.
Dye and drug release experiments
The capability of copolymer 3 to encapsulate a payload within mesoporous silica particles was demonstrated by performing UV–vis absorption spectroscopy on TB dye retained in the particles. TB was loaded into the silica particles by dissolving the dye (1 mg) in water (1 mL) followed by the addition of silica particles (50 mg). Following constant stirring at room temperature for 2 days, the suspension (100 μL) was added into an aqueous solution (1 mL) of copolymer 3 (20 mg mL−1) to allow the latter to electrostatically adsorb onto the particle surface. A control experiment was also conducted by adding the suspension (100 μL) into water (1 mL) in the absence of copolymer 3. Both samples were subsequently dialyzed for 4 days, centrifuged (5590 × g) and the precipitates were re-suspended in 1 M HCl (1 mL) for 5 min at room temperature. In the case of silica particles with a copolymer shell, the HCl treatment facilitates the detachment of the copolymer from the particle surface. The suspensions were subsequently centrifuged (5590 × g) and the supernatants containing released TB were diluted (five times) before running the UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy.
The drug release curve was constructed by measuring the amounts of tobramycin released from drug-loaded mesoporous silica particles without polymeric shell at various times. Silica particles were loaded with tobramycin by stirring an aqueous solution (100 μL) of tobramycin (400 mg mL−1) with silica particles (1 mg) for 3 days. The particles were centrifuged (10,956 × g), washed with DI water and re-suspended in DI water (1 mL) with continuous shaking at 37 °C. At each measurement time point (i.e., 20 min, 40 min, 80 min, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h and 96 h), the absorption spectrum of the supernatant after centrifugation (10,956 × g) was measured using a UV–Vis absorption spectrometer. The absorbance of tobramycin at 210 nm was used to determine the concentration of the drug37. The cumulative amount of tobramycin released at a particular measurement time was determined by summing the amount measured at that time and the cumulative amount measured at the last measurement time. After each absorption measurement, the silica particles, recovered by centrifugation (10,956 × g), were re-suspended in DI water (1 mL) and shaken. At the next measurement time, the absorption spectrum of the supernatant was again recorded. The total amount of tobramycin released from 1 mg of silica particles was estimated by fitting a double-exponential rise function to the cumulative release curve (Fig. 1b) (i.e., y = −(A1exp(−k1t) + A2exp(−k2t)) + C, where C is the total amount of drug released).
A similar experiment was conducted for copolymer 3-coated silica particles loaded with drug. Since the copolymer absorbs in the same region as tobramycin, a HPLC instrument (Waters 2695 Separation Module) equipped with a PDA detector set at 210 nm (Waters 2996 PDA) was used instead to determine the presence of released drug. An isocratic mobile phase consisting of a 0.05 M sodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH = 10) was used. Chromatography was carried out at 25 °C on an AlltimaTM C 18 5 u 250 mm × 4.6 mm column and the compounds eluted at a steady flow of 0.75 mL min−1. The retention time of tobramycin is ~61 min. For copolymer 3-coated silica particles loaded with drug, no tobramycin peaks were observed after dialysis (4 days).
Drug release with LPS-coated PS beads
A HPLC experiment was conducted to measure the amounts of tobramycin released from copolymer 3-coated mesoporous silica particles loaded with drug when stirred together with LPS-coated PS beads in water. The HPLC calibration curve was first constructed by measuring the peak area of tobramycin (peak at 60–70 min retention time) at various concentrations (i.e., 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg mL−1). The LPS-coated PS beads were prepared following the procedure in ref. 38 Basically, 10 mg PS latex beads (~1 μm mean particle size) were suspended in an aqueous solution (1 mL) of LPS (2.0 mg mL−1) for 20 min. The drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles (containing 10 mg of silica particles) were subsequently added into the LPS-coated PS solution and continuously stirred at 100 rpm at room temperature. At each measurement time point (i.e., 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 40 min, 80 min, 2 h and 4 h), the HPLC peak of the supernatant after centrifugation (10,956 × g) was measured. The amount of released tobramycin was determined using the calibration curve. Three control experiments were conducted: (i) an aqueous mixture (1 mL) containing drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles and free LPS (2.0 mg mL−1) was stirred at 100 rpm for 2 h, (ii) an aqueous mixture (1 mL) containing drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles and LPS-coated PS particles was allowed to be still for 2 h without stirring and (iii) an aqueous mixture (1 mL) containing drug-loaded copolymer 3-coated silica particles and amine-modified PS latex beads (~1 μm mean particle size and without LPS coating) (containing 10 mg beads) was stirred at 100 rpm for 2 h.
Colony expansion and proliferation tests
Exponential growth phase P. mirabilis (ATCC 7002) and B. subtilis (ATCC 6051) were used. The liquid culture media was lysogeny broth (LB). The exponential-growth phase was obtained by diluting an overnight culture 20 times and then cultured for a further 3 h. When an exponential-growth phase was obtained, the OD600 of the culture was 0.9 and the bacteria number was determined to be 107 CFU mL−1. The solid culture media was LB with 0.2% glucose and 1% or 4% agar for P. mirabilis, and LB with 0.5% agar for B. subtilis.
To demonstrate that copolymer 3-coated silica particles in the absence of loaded tobamycin is non-toxic against swarmer P. mirabilis, LB-agar solid media (1%) was first prepared in 10-cm diameter Petri dishes. The surface of the agar was divided into two equal parts. 0.8 mg of drug-free copolymer 3-coated silica particles were evenly applied onto the left side of the agar using an L-shape spreader and dried for 30 min before a fresh exponential-growth phase P. mirabilis culture (1 μL) was inoculated at a point on the right side of the agar (particle-free zone) (see Fig. 4a). The dish was dried for a further 30 min before incubation for 20 h at 37 oC.
To examine the effects of released tobramycin on swarmer P. mirabilis, the drug was first loaded and encapsulated within the silica particles. In this case, silica particles (1 mg) and tobramycin (400 mg mL−1) were mixed in water (100 μL) and stirred for 3 days. The suspension was then centrifuged (894 × g) and the precipitate was re-suspended in water (100μL) containing copolymer 3 (25 mg mL−1). The suspension was centrifuged (894 × g) and the precipitate was re-suspended in fresh DI water to achieve a particle concentration ranging from 1 to 0.25 mg mL−1.
Solid LB-agar media (1%) was prepared in 10-cm diameter Petri dishes. The surface of the agar was divided into two equal halves. An aqueous suspension of copolymer 3-coated particles (200 μL) was applied on the left half surface of the agar using an L-shape spreader to achieve various amounts of deposited particles (i.e., 0.2–0.05 mg of silica particles). The suspension was dried for 30 min before a fresh exponential-growth phase P. mirabilis culture (1 μL) was inoculated at a point on the right side of the agar (particle-free zone) (see Fig. 4b, c). The dish was dried for a further 30 min before incubation for 20 h at 37 °C.
To demonstrate that the drug release is not triggered by immobile cells, hard (4%) LB-agar was used. To prevent swarming P. mirabilis from undergoing differentiation, a harder agar (e.g., 4%) can be used5,32. It is worthwhile to note that differences in agar concentration do not significantly affect the inhibition zones and antibiotic gradient of free tobramycin32. An exponential-growth phase P. mirabilis culture (800 μL) was evenly inoculated on the entire agar surface and dried for 4 h to form a layer of immobile bacteria (see Fig. 4d). Drug-loaded silica particles (0.2 mg) with and without a copolymer shell were deposited on the left side of the agar. The dish was then incubated for 20 h at 37 °C.
For the swarmer B. subtilis experiment, an aqueous suspension (200 μL) of copolymer 3-coated silica particles loaded with tobramycin (0.05 mg) was first applied on the left half surface of a (0.5 %) LB-agar and dried for 30 min33,34. A fresh exponential-growth phase B. subtilis culture (1 μL) was inoculated at a point on the right side of the agar. The dish was dried for a further 30 min before incubation for 20 h at 37 °C. All experiments described here were repeated at least four times and the observations were found to be reproducible.
AFM force spectroscopy
Si wafers were cleaned by sonication in acetone solvent for 30 min, rinsed with DI water and dried by N2 gas. A thin superglue liquid film was applied on the surface of the Si wafer by spin-coating. LPS (from P. mirabilis), LPA (from B. subtilis) and copolymer 3 were made into thick films by freeze drying before they are attached onto the thin superglue film. The samples were left to further dry overnight, and any samples unattached were washed away by rinsing thoroughly with PBS buffer solution.
SiO2 AFM probes (spherical with diameter of 650 nm ± 10%) were purchased from TipsNano. A similar method as used for modifying silica particles was used to functionalize the SiO2 AFM probe with a shell of copolymer 3. The modified probe was washed with PBS buffer to remove any unattached copolymer. The spring constants of bare probe and modified probe were calibrated and values of 3.6 and 5.2 N m−1, respectively, were calculated by the built-in thermal tune. The force curves were measured in PBS buffer solution using an AFM instrument (Bruker, MultiMode 8). The adhesion forces between bare SiO2 probe and copolymer 3/LPS/LTA attached onto the wafer were measured. In addition, the adhesion forces between copolymer 3 adsorbed on the SiO2 probe and LPS/LTA attached onto the wafer were also measured.
Surface charge neutralization by zeta potential study
An overnight P. mirabilis culture (50 μL) was re-suspended in fresh LB media (5 mL) and continuously shaken at 180 rpm for 3 h at 37 °C. The culture was re-suspended in a phosphate buffer to afford OD600 ~ 0.2. 700 μL of the bacterial culture was then used in the zeta potential experiment. Increasing amounts of copolymer 3 were subsequently added and the resulting zeta potentials measured. A similar procedure was also used to measure the zeta potentials of B. subtilis in the presence of varying amounts of copolymer 3.
Wide-field fluorescence microscopy setup
The wide-field fluorescence microscopy consists of an inverted microscope (IX 71, Olympus) coupled to a highly sensitive CCD camera (CascadeII 512B, Photometrics). A white light source was fixed above the bacteria sample and used to observe bacteria motion and a 633 nm HeNe laser source (35 mW, Melles Griot) was used for fluorescence microscopy. The laser light was circular polarized and filtered by an excitation filter (Z633/10, Chroma) before being focused onto the back-focal plane of the objective lens. The transmitted light and fluorescence from the sample were passed through an air objective lens (20×, N.A. = 0.40, Olympus), a dichroic mirror (Z633rdc, Chroma), an emission filter (HQ645lp, Chroma) and a 3.3 × camera lens before entering the CCD camera. The dimension of an image frame was measured to be 120 × 120 μm2 (512 × 512 pixels) using a stage micrometer and the rate of the CCD camera is 30 frames per second.
An aqueous solution (20 μL) of copolymer 3 (25 mg mL−1) was mixed with an aqueous suspension (10 μL) of drug-free silica particles (25 mg mL−1) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min before centrifugation (894 × g). The precipitate was washed using water and re-suspended in water (1 mL). A drop of the particle suspension (1 μL) was deposited on the surface of 1 or 0.5 % LB-agar and dried for 30 min. A freshly prepared P. mirabilis exponential-growth phase culture (1 μL) was inoculated close to the particle zone on the 1% agar. The agar was dried for 30 min before incubation at 37 °C for 10 h to form a swarmer colony. For swarmer B. subtilis, the cells were inoculated close to the particle zone on the 0.5% agar and dried for 30 min before incubation at 37 oC for 3 h to form a swarmer colony. Wide-field fluorescence microscopy was used to visualize the interaction between dye-labelled copolymer chains on the particle surface and motile swarmer P. mirabilis and B. subtilis.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Nanyang Technological University for financial support. A MOE Tier 1 grant (RG6/15) is acknowledged.
Author contributions
E.K.L.Y. designed and conceived the experiments with inputs from S.L. S.B. and B.X., and S.L., W.B., Q.D., S.S., X.W. and A.S. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. The paper was written by E.K.L.Y., and all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-06729-6.
References
- 1.Allison C, Coleman N, Jones PL, Hughes C. Ability of proteus-mirabilis to invade human urothelial cells is coupled to motility and swarming differentiation. Infect. Immun. 1992;60:4740–4746. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4740-4746.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allison C, Emödy L, Coleman N, Hughes C. The role of swarm cell-differentiation and multicellular migration in the uropathogenicity of proteus-mirabilis. J. Infect. Dis. 1994;169:1155–1158. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.5.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schaffer JN, Pearson MM. Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015;3:UTI-0017–UTI-2013. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jacobsen SM, Stickler DJ, Mobley HLT, Shirtliff ME. Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to escherichia coli and proteus mirabilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008;21:26–59. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kearns DB. A field guide to bacterial swarming motility. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:634–644. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stickler D, Hughes G. Ability of proteus mirabilis to swarm over urethral catheters. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1999;18:206–208. doi: 10.1007/s100960050260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jones BV, Young R, Mahenthiralingam E, Stickler DJ. Ultrastructure of proteus mirabilis swarmer cell rafts and role of swarming in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:3941–3950. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.3941-3950.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhu X, Radovic-Moreno AF, Wu J, Langer R, Shi J. Nanomedicine in the management of microbial infection – overview and perspectives. Nano Today. 2014;9:478–498. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:2602–2663. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Y, Shim MS, Levinson NS, Sung HW, Xia Y. Stimuli-responsive materials for controlled release of theranostic agents. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014;24:4206. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201400279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Garcia-Gonzalez CA, Bucio E, Concheiro A. Stimuli-responsive polymers for antimicrobial therapy: drug targeting, contact-killing surfaces and competitive release. Expert. Opin. Drug. Deliv. 2016;13:1109–1119. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2016.1178719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pornpattanangkul D, et al. Bacterial toxin-triggered drug release from gold nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes for the treatment of bacterial infection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:4132–4139. doi: 10.1021/ja111110e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xiong MH, et al. Lipase-sensitive polymeric triple-layered nanogel for “on-demand” drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:4355–4362. doi: 10.1021/ja211279u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Komnatnyy VV, Chiang WC, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Nielsen TE. Bacteria-triggered release of antimicrobial agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;126:449–451. doi: 10.1002/ange.201307975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ji H, et al. Bacterial hyaluronidase self-triggered prodrug release for chemo-photothermal synergistic treatment of bacterial infection. Small. 2016;12:6200–6206. doi: 10.1002/smll.201601729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Horev B, et al. pH-activated nanoparticles for controlled topical delivery of farnesol to disrupt oral biofilm virulence. ACS Nano. 2015;9:2390–2404. doi: 10.1021/nn507170s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pavlukhina S, et al. Small-molecule-hosting nanocomposite films with multiple bacteria-triggered responses. NPG Asia Mater. 2014;6:e121. doi: 10.1038/am.2014.63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cooperstein MA, Canavan HE. Assessment of cytotoxicity of (N-isopropyl acrylamide) and poly(N-isopropel acrylamide)-coated surfaces. Biointerphases. 2013;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1559-4106-8-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lanzalaco S, Armelin E. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and copolymers: a review on recent progress in biomedical applications. Gels. 2017;3:36. doi: 10.3390/gels3040036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hu Y, et al. Cytosolic delivery mediated via electrostatic surface binding of protein, virus, or siRNA cargos to pH-responsive core-shell gel particles. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:756–765. doi: 10.1021/bm801199z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ji W, Panus D, Palumbo RN, Tang R, Wang C. Poly(2-aminoethyl methacrylate) with well-defined chain-length for DNA vaccine delivery to dendritic cells. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:4373–4385. doi: 10.1021/bm201360v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bhunia A, Mohanram H, Domadia PN, Torres D, Bhattacharjya S. Designed β-boomerang antiendotoxic and antimicrobial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:21991–22004. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu F, et al. Lipopolysaccharide neutralizing peptide-porphyrin conjugate for effective photoinactivation and intracellular imaging of gram-negative bacterial strains. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23:1639–1647. doi: 10.1021/bc300203d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu F, et al. Peptide-perylene diimide functionalized magnetic nano-platforms for fluorescence turn-on detection and clearance of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:6200–6203. doi: 10.1039/C4CC01266F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brandenburg K, Heinbockel L, Correa W, Lohner K. Peptides with dual mode of action: killing bacteria and preventing endotoxin-induced septis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1858:971–979. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Papo N, Shai Y. A molecular mechanism for lipopolysaccharide protection of gram-negative bacteria from antimicrobial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:10378–10387. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412865200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yavuz MS, et al. Gold nanocages covered by smart polymers for controlled release with near-infrared light. Nat. Maters. 2008;8:935–939. doi: 10.1038/nmat2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cai Q, et al. Dilute solution routes to various controllable morphologies of MCM-41 silica with a basic medium. Chem. Matter. 2001;13:258–263. doi: 10.1021/cm990661z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Landes RR. Single daily doses of tobramycin in therapy of urinary tract infections. J. Infect. Dis. 1976;134:S142. doi: 10.1093/infdis/134.Supplement_1.S142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Takahashi Y, Okabe T, Takeuchi H, Daijoh K, Ohshiro K. Clinical evaluation of tobramycin. Chemotherapy. 1975;23:1290–1296. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J. Pharm. Sci. 1963;52:1145–1149. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600521210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lai S, Tremblay J, Déziel E. Swarming motility: a multicellular behavior conferring antimicrobial resistance. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;11:126–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lu S, Bi W, Liu F, Xing B, Yeow EKL. Loss of collective motion in swarming bacteria undergoing stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111:208101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.208101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lu S, Liu F, Xing B, Yeow EKL. Nontoxic colloidal particles impede antibiotic resistance of swarming bacteria by disrupting collective motion and speed. Phys. Rev. E. 2015;92:062706. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Psarra E, et al. Nanostructured biointerfaces: nanoarchitectonics of thermoresponsive polymer brushes impact protein adsorption and cell adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:12516–12529. doi: 10.1021/am508161q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Elsaesser A, Howard CV. Toxicology of nanoparticles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012;64:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruckmani K, Shaikh SZ, Khalil P, Muneera MS. A simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determining tobramycin in pharmaceutical formulations by direct UV detection. Pharm. Methods. 2011;2:117–123. doi: 10.4103/2229-4708.84455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.West AP, et al. TLR signaling augments macrophage bactericidal activity through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2011;472:476–482. doi: 10.1038/nature09973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.